2022
DOI: 10.2298/vsp200516094m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopy time in intramedullary and extramedullary fixation of trochanteric fractures

Abstract: Background/Aim. Cephalomedullary and extramedullary methods are used for the internal fixation of trochanteric fractures. The usage of the third generation Gamma Nail (GN) is a gold standard in this kind of treatments. Self-dynamisable Internal Fixator (SIF) is an extramedullary implant for trochanteric fractures? treatment. The aim of this study was to compare these two methods regarding operation time and intraoperative fluoroscopy time. Methods. A total of 89 patients with a surgical treatment of a trochant… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here should be noted that sliding screw extensions used in intramedullary nails are shorter than in extramedullary SIF implants. This is because the stem of the SIF implants is placed completely outside the bone on the lateral femoral side, while the stem of the intramedullary nails is positioned more medially [ 2 , 7 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here should be noted that sliding screw extensions used in intramedullary nails are shorter than in extramedullary SIF implants. This is because the stem of the SIF implants is placed completely outside the bone on the lateral femoral side, while the stem of the intramedullary nails is positioned more medially [ 2 , 7 , 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%