2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10228-017-0605-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of otolith morphology in three species of Scomber

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The otoliths of Decapterus ruselli have a shape that is very different from that of the Scombrini species, where the shape tends to be oval due to the convex dorsal and ventral parts, but also has an elongated antirostrum in the end of anterior. Study by [20] about otolith shape analysis is based on both shape index analysis and Fourier ellipse analysis, therefore, the description of the otolith shape and morphology of these three species can be used as a reference for future researchers to carry out otolith shape analysis as an additional classification of species, especially in the species Scomber australasicus and Scomber japonicus which is quite difficult to identify only from its morphological features, because the morphology of the two is quite identical. As for other ways to clarify species identification by [21] about otolith's of Scomberb using state that otolith shape analysis technique using the contour of otolith to classify the stock is considered more efficient than using morphological parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The otoliths of Decapterus ruselli have a shape that is very different from that of the Scombrini species, where the shape tends to be oval due to the convex dorsal and ventral parts, but also has an elongated antirostrum in the end of anterior. Study by [20] about otolith shape analysis is based on both shape index analysis and Fourier ellipse analysis, therefore, the description of the otolith shape and morphology of these three species can be used as a reference for future researchers to carry out otolith shape analysis as an additional classification of species, especially in the species Scomber australasicus and Scomber japonicus which is quite difficult to identify only from its morphological features, because the morphology of the two is quite identical. As for other ways to clarify species identification by [21] about otolith's of Scomberb using state that otolith shape analysis technique using the contour of otolith to classify the stock is considered more efficient than using morphological parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, males and females were moderately discriminated using otolith shape indices. In some of the studies on discrimination between otolith shape indices of different groups, high discrimination success among groups was achieved by using shape indices (He et al ., 2018; Pothin et al ., 2006), but it is seen that shape indices are not very successful in separating groups in most of them (Agüera & Brophy, 2011; Başusta & Khan, 2021; Tuset et al ., 2003). Additionally, since shape indices are calculated using similar otolith measurements, there may be multicollinearity between the data, which is a negative situation in terms of their usefulness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due consideration should be paid also to the usefulness of other morphometrical methods (e.g. Tuset et al 2016;He et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%