2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.08.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Femoral Endarterectomy plus Endovascular (Hybrid) or Bypass for Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are in line with a recent study by Fereydooni et al that reported an increasing use of hybrid revascularizations between 2010 and 2017 in the Vascular Quality Initiative database [16]. Compared to other recent studies that analyzed hybrid revascularization approaches, we additionally divided this group into subgroups (hybrid or two-step) according to whether these interventions were performed as a real hybrid revascularization in one setting or if both an endovascular and surgical revascularizations were performed in one hospitalization [16][17][18]. In addition to lower costs and shorter stay, we also found lower endovascular procedural codes in the true hybrid group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These findings are in line with a recent study by Fereydooni et al that reported an increasing use of hybrid revascularizations between 2010 and 2017 in the Vascular Quality Initiative database [16]. Compared to other recent studies that analyzed hybrid revascularization approaches, we additionally divided this group into subgroups (hybrid or two-step) according to whether these interventions were performed as a real hybrid revascularization in one setting or if both an endovascular and surgical revascularizations were performed in one hospitalization [16][17][18]. In addition to lower costs and shorter stay, we also found lower endovascular procedural codes in the true hybrid group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Although several studies reported a cost benefit of endovascular revascularizations compared to surgical approaches, the healthcare costs for the treatment of PAD are still high and continue to rise, especially in patients with higher comorbidity [4,5,9,14,15]. Additionally, hybrid revascularization procedures have also recently been shown to increase in number and provide perioperative advantages to open surgical revascularization [16][17][18]. Overall, robust large-scale data to understand how the surge in resulting costs can be explained and what the role of different revascularization approaches (such as hybrid interventions) is, are lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3,13,14,36–40 Hybrid revascularization techniques can also be used for revascularization of PAD, especially for patient anatomy including aortoiliac disease, and the use of hybrid revascularization procedures is supported by observational studies. 5,6,9–11,41–45 In the aortoiliac segment, less invasive hybrid procedures have similar primary patency and limb salvage rates when compared with open surgical reconstruction, 4,5,45 especially when using covered stent grafts. 4,6,7,45 Similarly, hybrid infrainguinal interventions have similar patency and limb salvage rates to open bypass in selected patients.…”
Section: Management Of Cltimentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Lower morbidity and mortality rates were seen after performing endarterectomy compared to bypass procedures. 11 DeCarlo et al [ 63 ] USA (n=4,478) Overall complications were much higher in patients with vein or prosthetic graft compared to patients who had a hybrid revascularization (OR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.04-2.02; P = 0.028) Patients with ICD underwent more complications post open bypass as opposed to patients who sought a hybrid approach to their treatment. 12 Kuma et al [ 64 ] Japan Retrospective study (n=111) 75 patients (n=111) with ICD were compared to 43 patients with CLI.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While preventative measures and routine care of the extremities serve as effective methods to limit disease progression, a holistic approach must be considered depending on the patient profile. We looked at over 12 primary research articles and recognized that endovascular interventions are necessary to provide comprehensive treatment for PAD [53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]. The findings are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%