2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2020.129078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of photothermal boiling of water enhanced by nano- and micro-particles of carbon black

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Volumetric solar steam generation devices composed of nanofluids or suspending nanomaterials in base fluids suffer from several obstacles such as instability of the nanofluids, high production costs, and exposure to radiation, conduction, and convection heat loss due to inevitable heating of the bulk liquid (Amjad et al 2018;Babita et al 2016;Bakthavatchalam et al 2020;Chen et al 2018;Colangelo et al 2016;Gao et al 2019a, b;Ghafurian et al 2020a;Goharshadi et al 2013a, b;Hajatzadeh Pordanjani et al 2019;Li et al 2019b, c, a;Liu et al 2018a, b, c, d;Liu and Xuan, 2017;Mahian et al 2019;Mehrkhah et al 2022;Pilch-wr et al 2021;Sheikhpour et al 2020;Struchalin et al 2021;Wang et al 2016a, b;Zareei et al 2019;Zeiny et al 2018). The interfacial solar steam generation devices consist of a double-layer photoabsorber at the seawater's surface (Amjad et al 2018;Colangelo et al 2016;Deng et al 2017;Gao et al 2019a, b;Struchalin et al 2021). The top layer is a photothermal material that absorbs the sunlight and converts it into thermal energy efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Volumetric solar steam generation devices composed of nanofluids or suspending nanomaterials in base fluids suffer from several obstacles such as instability of the nanofluids, high production costs, and exposure to radiation, conduction, and convection heat loss due to inevitable heating of the bulk liquid (Amjad et al 2018;Babita et al 2016;Bakthavatchalam et al 2020;Chen et al 2018;Colangelo et al 2016;Gao et al 2019a, b;Ghafurian et al 2020a;Goharshadi et al 2013a, b;Hajatzadeh Pordanjani et al 2019;Li et al 2019b, c, a;Liu et al 2018a, b, c, d;Liu and Xuan, 2017;Mahian et al 2019;Mehrkhah et al 2022;Pilch-wr et al 2021;Sheikhpour et al 2020;Struchalin et al 2021;Wang et al 2016a, b;Zareei et al 2019;Zeiny et al 2018). The interfacial solar steam generation devices consist of a double-layer photoabsorber at the seawater's surface (Amjad et al 2018;Colangelo et al 2016;Deng et al 2017;Gao et al 2019a, b;Struchalin et al 2021). The top layer is a photothermal material that absorbs the sunlight and converts it into thermal energy efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NP-based solar absorber has by far demonstrated the highest efficiencies because of its superior electronic, optical, and thermal properties. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] Among them, gold NPs, [28,29] aluminum NPs, [20,30] MXene, [31,32] carbon nanotubes (CNTs), [33,34] graphene, [35,36] carbon dots, [37,38] carbon black, [39,40] polymers, [41,42] plasmonic NPs, and [41,43] black oxide NPs [44,45] have been widely investigated in recent years. However, none of them hit extreme popularity because of the higher cost and poor extensibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%