Comparative analysis of port performance indicators: Independency and interdependency

Abstract

Port performance measurement (PPM) and comparison research, presenting a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) issue in nature, has been intensively conducted by researchers from both decision science on modelling and port studies from empirical perspectives. Assigning an appropriate weight to each defined port performance indicator (PPI) is essential for rational decision and precise performance measurement. However, PPIs are often presented in a hierarchy, having the interdependency among them ignored. It causes concerns on the accuracy of PPIs' weight allocation and arguments on the performance measurement results, revealing a significant research gap to be addressed. As far as MCDM modelling is concerned, the importance of criteria has been studied utilising either absolute or relative comparisons, while the calculation of their importance also takes into account both independency and interdependency factors. However, there is lack of empirical studies in the literature to provide supporting evidence to distinguish the different impacts of the two factors. This study aims to compare the analysis of PPIs importance when taking into account their independent relationship using an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and their interdependent relationship using a decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) incorporating an analytic network process (ANP), respectively. The same domain experts are invited to evaluate the importance of the defined PPIs based on both approaches. The results demonstrate that a similar variance of relative importance across the PPIs but a clear difference on their importance scores and ranking. As a result, the results make contributions to fulfil the research gap on consideration of interdependency among PPIs in PPM and on the provision of convincing empirical evidence to highlight the impact of interdependency of criteria on MCDM modelling. Another practical significance draw from this study is that use of DEMATEL can aid port stakeholders to make more rational decision as to whether the interdependency among PPIs should be taken into account in PPM and/or port choice.

A multicriteria decision making approach to study barriers to the adoption of autonomous vehicles

“…A challenge here is the lack of a clear consensus on how must be set. For example, Rahman and Subramanian (2012) take it to be 0.2, while Ha and Yang (2017) compute as the mean of all . In some DEMATEL studies, the standard deviation ( ) of all is used along with , as for example (Bai and Sarkis, 2013), (Rajesh and Ravi, 2015) and (Zhu et al, 2015).…”

Port performance in container transport logistics: A multi-stakeholder perspective

“…mostly in absolute measurement method). AHP (Saaty, 1980) is found to be a suitable method for evaluating the relative importance of the attributes through assuring the consistency of expert's judgement with a consistency ratio (CR) of all pair-wise comparisons (Ha and Yang, 2017). In addition, this study incorporates AHP into an IPA grid method of the data-centred quadrants (Martilla and James, 1977) by referring to the literature associated with use of IPA in the transport and port domains (e.g.…”

Port performance measurement in the context of port choice: an MCDA approach

“…The framework they developed can be beneficial for port efficiency by focusing port strategies on activities that generate the most added value in logistics and supply chains. Ha and Yang (2017) introduced a hybrid multi-stakeholder framework for the modeling of port performance indicators. The framework offers a diagnostic instrument for performance evaluation of terminals and ports.…”