2020
DOI: 10.1111/his.14054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of programmed cell death ligand 1 assays in renal cell carcinoma

Abstract: AimsThe importance of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression has emerged in clinical trials of PD‐L1 target therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study compares PD‐L1 assays in RCC.Methods and resultsTwo US Food and Drug Administration‐approved PD‐L1 assays (22C3 and SP142) and one research‐use only antibody (E1L3N) were used in a retrospective cohort of 591 patients with RCC. PD‐L1 positivity on tumour cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) and combined positive score (CPS) were evaluated. With t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PD-L1 expression was first evaluated according to the intensity (negative, weak, moderate, or strong) and the percentage of positive tumor cells and immune cells, including lymphocytes and macrophages. Either tumor cells with membranous patterns or immune cells with cytoplasmic or membranous patterns showing more than weak intensity in > 1% were considered positive for PD-L1 expression [ 11 ]. The investigator was blinded to the associated clinicopathological information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PD-L1 expression was first evaluated according to the intensity (negative, weak, moderate, or strong) and the percentage of positive tumor cells and immune cells, including lymphocytes and macrophages. Either tumor cells with membranous patterns or immune cells with cytoplasmic or membranous patterns showing more than weak intensity in > 1% were considered positive for PD-L1 expression [ 11 ]. The investigator was blinded to the associated clinicopathological information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these 3 tests were compared, PD-L1 expression scores showed moderate to high positive correlation. Staining in TIMCs was statistically similar, although relatively less frequent with E1L3N [29]. Sommer et al compared PD-L1 expression with 4 different immunohistochemical methods in advanced RCC and found that PD-L1 positivity in tumours with Ventana SP142 was significantly lower than the others (Ventana SP263, Dako 28-8, Dako 22C3).…”
Section: Ccrcc -Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Chrcc -Chromophobe Re...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ma et al reported that E1L3N showed poor staining of gastric tumor cells compared to SP142 and 28-8 in surgical specimens on different detection platforms (13). Similarly, the E1L3N assay using Ventana BenchMark XT automated platform showed lower PD-L1 positivity of bile duct tumor cells than SP263 and 22C3 assays in tissue microarrays (TMA) or whole tissue sections (24). The PD-L1 expression status in NSCLC biopsy samples using 22C3 and E1L3N antibodies on the Dako AutostainerLink-48 platform remains only partially understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%