2016
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of protein interactome networks prioritizes candidate genes with cancer signatures

Abstract: Comprehensive understanding of human cancer mechanisms requires the identification of a thorough list of cancer-associated genes, which could serve as biomarkers for diagnoses and therapies in various types of cancer. Although substantial progress has been made in functional studies to uncover genes involved in cancer, these efforts are often time-consuming and costly. Therefore, it remains challenging to comprehensively identify cancer candidate genes. Network-based methods have accelerated this process throu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Protein interaction networks have been compared elsewhere. For example, comparing the power of five PPI networks to predict cancer genes [ 29 ], benchmarking 21 networks for their ability to predict disease genes [ 30 ], and investigating their impact on recovering novel PPIs from high-throughput data [ 31 ]. However, to our knowledge our study is the first to specifically address the context-specific nature of PPI entries in these databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein interaction networks have been compared elsewhere. For example, comparing the power of five PPI networks to predict cancer genes [ 29 ], benchmarking 21 networks for their ability to predict disease genes [ 30 ], and investigating their impact on recovering novel PPIs from high-throughput data [ 31 ]. However, to our knowledge our study is the first to specifically address the context-specific nature of PPI entries in these databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network-based approaches for the identification of biomarkers for different diseases have been previously investigated ( 24 , 25 ). These approaches used the genes associated with the specific condition to construct the network and selected the hub molecules that may potentially be associated with the disease condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic map of ~16,000 high-quality human binary protein-protein interaction network, which was identified by yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) assay, was used in our analysis (20,21). The homodimer interactions were removed and there are 15,957 interactions among 4,743 genes for further analysis.…”
Section: Protein-protein Interaction Network and Signaling Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%