2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Sagittal-Plane Radiographic Landmarks Used to Identify the Femoral Attachments of Lateral Knee Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to Kremen et al., 16 there is a variability of the anatomy of lateral knee structures and a lack of reproducible radiographic criteria to identify these structures.…”
Section: Anatomic Landmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to Kremen et al., 16 there is a variability of the anatomy of lateral knee structures and a lack of reproducible radiographic criteria to identify these structures.…”
Section: Anatomic Landmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can, in part, be attributed to the challenges involved in capturing sagittal plane radiographs reliably. 6 – 8 Dynamic factors such as patient position need to be taken into consideration. 1 , 9 For example, assessment of the sagittal mechanical axis (sMA) should be done on an image where the knee is in maximal extension, this often must be done in the supine position to allow relaxation of the hamstring muscles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of reproducible radiographic criteria to identify these structures suggests that radiographic landmarks should not be relied on to identify the placement of femoral grafts or fixation devices. 10 MRI is commonly used for evaluating lateral knee ligament structures. Can an MRI evaluation of the ALL be trusted?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%