2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Scattering and Random Features in Hyperspectral Image Classification

Abstract: Hyperspectral images (HSI) contains extremely rich spectral and spatial information that offers great potential to discriminate between various land cover classes. The inherent high dimensionality and insufficient training samples in such images introduces Hughes phenomenon. In order to deal with this issue, several preprocessing techniques have been integrated in processing chain of HSI prior to classification. Supervised feature extraction is one such method which mitigates the curse of dimensionality induce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed algorithm was compared with some recent classification methods. The results of the hyperspectral reference dataset classification using the HCDA algorithm were compared with the results of other algorithms in previous studies [13,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. The overall accuracy of the reference dataset classification for various algorithms indicates that HCDA results were better than results of other algorithms.…”
Section: Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed algorithm was compared with some recent classification methods. The results of the hyperspectral reference dataset classification using the HCDA algorithm were compared with the results of other algorithms in previous studies [13,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. The overall accuracy of the reference dataset classification for various algorithms indicates that HCDA results were better than results of other algorithms.…”
Section: Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4) Integrated spectral-spatial methods combine information from spectral signatures and spatial neighborhoods simultaneously, and are also common. Some methods consider sequences of 1D spectra [20] (for example in variety of NN called Long Short Term Memory or LSTM) or flatten the HSI cube to a matrix and use 2D methods [33], but by far the most popular methods involve building 3D filters [22], [5], [15], [10], [14], [11], [16], [12], [17], [9]. 3D convolutional layers in NNs, CNNs, and RCNNs, both shallow and deep have been evaluated [5], [22].…”
Section: Related Work a Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However neural networks with multiple layers naturally model a hierarchical interaction of features, with as many degrees of interaction as number of layers in the network: [6], [20], [5], [4], [26], [23], [29], [22], [8], [21]. The same can be said for the layers of scattering networks: [17], [33], [13], [31], [27]. This distinguishes these two classes of approaches from purely wavelet [34], [12], [15], [16] or time-frequency methods [11], [9], [3], [10], and yields more sophisticated features that yield better classification results, as we show in Section IV.…”
Section: Related Work a Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional techniques prove inefficient when confronted with the Hughes phenomenon caused by the high-dimensional nature of spectral channels. Moreover, the presence of redundant information and the increase in computational time due to high dimensionality may have a negative effect on HSI classification [12]. However, the advent of deep learning technology has injected new energy into HSI classification and demonstrated immense potential [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%