1993
DOI: 10.1016/0166-0934(93)90126-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of scrapie agent inactivation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
86
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
86
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The high resistance of TSE agents to conventional methods of chemical or thermal inactivation and to UV or ionizing radiation (Alper et al, 1966(Alper et al, , 1967Brown et al, 1982Brown et al, , 1986Kimberlin et al, 1983;Taguchi et al, 1991;Tateishi et al, 1991;Ernst & Race, 1993;Taylor et al, 1994;Manuelidis, 1997;Taylor, 1999; for review see Taylor, 2000), as well as their high binding affinity to and tenacity on steel surfaces (Zobeley et al, 1999;Flechsig et al, 2001), warrant specific decontamination procedures in the reprocessing of surgical instruments (Rutala & Weber, 2001). Treatments that are considered appropriate for decontamination include use of 1-2 M NaOH solution (for 24 h), 2?5-5 % NaOCl solution (for 24 h) as well as 3, 4 or 6 M GdnSCN solution (for 24 h, 1 h or 15 min, respectively), followed by steam sterilization at 134 u C for 18 min to 1 h (Simon & Pauli, 1998;World Health Organization, 1999;Hörnlimann et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high resistance of TSE agents to conventional methods of chemical or thermal inactivation and to UV or ionizing radiation (Alper et al, 1966(Alper et al, , 1967Brown et al, 1982Brown et al, , 1986Kimberlin et al, 1983;Taguchi et al, 1991;Tateishi et al, 1991;Ernst & Race, 1993;Taylor et al, 1994;Manuelidis, 1997;Taylor, 1999; for review see Taylor, 2000), as well as their high binding affinity to and tenacity on steel surfaces (Zobeley et al, 1999;Flechsig et al, 2001), warrant specific decontamination procedures in the reprocessing of surgical instruments (Rutala & Weber, 2001). Treatments that are considered appropriate for decontamination include use of 1-2 M NaOH solution (for 24 h), 2?5-5 % NaOCl solution (for 24 h) as well as 3, 4 or 6 M GdnSCN solution (for 24 h, 1 h or 15 min, respectively), followed by steam sterilization at 134 u C for 18 min to 1 h (Simon & Pauli, 1998;World Health Organization, 1999;Hörnlimann et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,9,14 Since techniques that destroy prions (i.e., alkaline hydrolysis, treatment with the phenolic disinfectant LpH) may not be available or practical for disposal of infected animals or tissues, 3,14,15 alternative, practical methods for decontamination of TSEcontaminated biomaterial are needed. Because the reduction of PK-resistant PrP can be correlated to infectivity loss, 1,8 we speculate that the time-and temperaturedependent reduction in PrP CWD immunoreactivity could reflect its destruction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gravity displacement and prevacuum (porous load) steam sterilizers have been tested using various temperatures and total cycle times (4,30,34,37). However, the results are also contradictory, with some reports showing complete inactivation of the prion and other reports showing incomplete inactivation with both prevacuum (porous load) and gravity displacement steam sterilizers (4,29,30,35,37).…”
Section: Infection Control Issues and Cjdmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Chemical processes include the use of either sodium hypochlorite or sodium hydroxide, which have both been found to be effective in decreasing the infectivity of prions (4,30,34,37). In one study, an unexplained and unexpected finding associated with sodium hydroxide was that with bovine spongiform encephalopathy and scrapie agents, 2 h exposures were less effective than 30 or 60 min procedures (30).…”
Section: Infection Control Issues and Cjdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation