2018
DOI: 10.5120/ijca2018917444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Stock Market Prediction System using SVM and ANN

Abstract: Support vector machines (SVM) and artificial neural networks (ANN) are machine learning methods that find a wide range of applications both in the field of engineering and social sciences. Here, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support vector machines (SVM) are employed to predict stock market daily trends: ups and downs. The purpose is to study the variation in certain parameters like accuracy, time efficiency of both classifiers (ANN and SVM) on similar datasets in predicting stock market daily trends. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results of Madhu, B. et al (2021) [6] depict how ANN outperforms SVM in predicting option price and is a promising technique and can be adopted as an alternative of the SVM model in predicting option price. Talekar, S. (2020) [7] also gives a somewhat similar result but the amount of difference in accuracy here is negligible and the authors balance SVM's lack of inaccuracy with the amount of time consumed to train the ANN model. Di Persio, L., & Honchar, O.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The experimental results of Madhu, B. et al (2021) [6] depict how ANN outperforms SVM in predicting option price and is a promising technique and can be adopted as an alternative of the SVM model in predicting option price. Talekar, S. (2020) [7] also gives a somewhat similar result but the amount of difference in accuracy here is negligible and the authors balance SVM's lack of inaccuracy with the amount of time consumed to train the ANN model. Di Persio, L., & Honchar, O.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 56%