2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-10463-4_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Symbolic Reasoning Models for Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling with words, in Reference 12 , uses linguistic hedge in Reference 13 for implementing process as in Figure 4 with linguistic connection matrix as in Figure 5 and inference based on linguistic tuples with some negative hedges. Our investigation adopt positive in both numeric and linguistic domain for modeling with words in two steps: transform domain and semantic quantify mapping (SQM) in Reference 14 .…”
Section: Reasoning With Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling with words, in Reference 12 , uses linguistic hedge in Reference 13 for implementing process as in Figure 4 with linguistic connection matrix as in Figure 5 and inference based on linguistic tuples with some negative hedges. Our investigation adopt positive in both numeric and linguistic domain for modeling with words in two steps: transform domain and semantic quantify mapping (SQM) in Reference 14 .…”
Section: Reasoning With Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM) [1]- [6] are fuzzy signed digraphs in which the nodes represent high-level descriptive concepts and the links represent positively or negatively causal influences between concepts, along with the corresponding strengths of these influences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%