2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/3521793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of the Reported Animal-Vehicle Collisions Data and Carcass Removal Data for Hotspot Identification

Abstract: Two common types of animal-vehicle collision data (reported animal-vehicle collision (AVC) data and carcass removal data) are usually recorded by transportation management agencies. Previous studies have found that these two datasets often demonstrate different characteristics. To accurately identify the higher-risk animal-vehicle collision sites, this study compared the differences in hotspot identification and the effect of explanation variables between carcass removal and reported AVCs. To complete the obje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(42 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the finding is counter-intuitive, it is not uncommon. Some studies attributed the reason for this finding to the impact of louder noises of trucks compared with lighter vehicles in keeping the wildlife away from the roadway segments with higher truck percentage ( 26 , 28 ). Furthermore, the elevated seating position and the wider view of the drivers inside a truck may also provide advantages in spotting wildlife far down the road.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the finding is counter-intuitive, it is not uncommon. Some studies attributed the reason for this finding to the impact of louder noises of trucks compared with lighter vehicles in keeping the wildlife away from the roadway segments with higher truck percentage ( 26 , 28 ). Furthermore, the elevated seating position and the wider view of the drivers inside a truck may also provide advantages in spotting wildlife far down the road.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murphy and Xia (2016) There are a few studies done both nationally and internationally which seek to identify the hotspots of AVCs. Yang et al (2019) compared the difference in hotspot identification between carcass removal data and reported AVCs. Both negative binomial data and generalized negative binomial data are applied in this study using the animal collision data collected on ten highways in Washington State.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of risk was created named as "deer-vehicle collision index". Yang et al (2019) applied statistical analysis technique of Negative Binomial (NB) model and Generalized Negative Binomial (GNB) to differentiate the location of high-risk collision and effect of some specific parameters for two different types of reported data: carcass removal and AVC record. Empirical Binomial (EB) values are produced and the results show that further variables, such as types of road, are needed to increase the accuracy of the analysis.…”
Section: Avc Spatial Modelling Studymentioning
confidence: 99%