Comparative analysis of the silk gland transcriptomes between the domestic and wild silkworms

Abstract

BackgroundBombyx mori was domesticated from the Chinese wild silkworm, Bombyx mandarina. Wild and domestic silkworms are good models in which to investigate genes related to silk protein synthesis that may be differentially expressed in silk glands, because their silk productions are very different. Here we used the mRNA deep sequencing (RNA-seq) approach to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the transcriptomes of the median/posterior silk glands of two domestic and two wild silkworms.ResultsThe results indicated that about 58% of the total genes were expressed (reads per kilo bases per million reads (RPKM) ≥ 1) in each silkworm. Comparisons of the domestic and wild silkworm transcriptomes revealed 32 DEGs, of which 16 were up-regulated in the domestic silkworms compared with in the wild silkworms, and the other 16 were up-regulated in the wild silkworms compared with in the domestic silkworms. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed for 15 randomly selected DEGs in domestic versus wild silkworms. The qPCR results were mostly consistent with the expression levels determined from the RNA-seq data. Based on a Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and manual annotation, five of the up-regulated DEGs in the wild silkworms were predicted to be involved in immune response, and seven of the up-regulated DEGs were related to the GO term “oxidoreductase activity”, which is associated with antioxidant systems. In the domestic silkworms, the up-regulated DEGs were related mainly to tissue development, secretion of proteins and metabolism.ConclusionsThe up-regulated DEGs in the two domestic silkworms may be involved mainly in the highly efficient biosynthesis and secretion of silk proteins, while the up-regulated DEGs in the two wild silkworms may play more important roles in tolerance to pathogens and environment adaptation. Our results provide a foundation for understanding the molecular mechanisms of the silk production difference between domestic and wild silkworms.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1287-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Transcriptome Analysis of the Cf-12-Mediated Resistance Response to Cladosporium fulvum in Tomato

“…Total RNA from Cf-12- tomato leaves was extracted and analyzed, as previously described (Fang et al, 2015). The integrity of the isolated RNA was calculated, as previously described (Schroeder et al, 2006); and samples with an RNA integrity number >9.0 were used for libraries construction.…”

Transcriptome Analysis of the Sm-Mediated Hypersensitive Response to Stemphylium lycopersici in Tomato

“…Total RNA was extracted from three biological replicates for each treatment with three plants according to an RNeasy Plant Mini Kit extraction protocol and was then used in the RT-qPCR experiments (Schroeder et al, 2006; Fang et al, 2015). Total RNA was treated with DNase I, and oligo (dT) was used to isolate mRNA.…”

Identification and comparison of long non‐coding RNAs in the silk gland between domestic and wild silkworms

“…Compared with its wild progenitor, B. mandarina , many phenotypic traits of the domestic silkworm have changed greatly, for example, silk yield, flight and body color. Indeed, silk yield of the domestic silkworm is about 3–5 times that of the wild silkworm (Normile, ; Takasu et al ., ; Fang et al ., ). However, little is known about the genetic mechanisms of increased silk yield in the domestic silkworm (Ma et al ., ).…”

“…However, little is known about the genetic mechanisms of increased silk yield in the domestic silkworm (Ma et al ., ). Our previous study suggested that the higher efficient biosynthesis and secretion of silk proteins may contribute to elevated silk yield in the domestic silkworm (Fang et al ., ). At present, most of the studies on silk yield focus on the protein‐coding genes and microRNAs (miRNAs) (Li et al ., ; Fang et al ., ).…”