2022
DOI: 10.3390/lubricants10090207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of the Work of Bridge Spherical Bearing at Different Antifriction Layer Locations

Abstract: The novel results reported here present qualitative and quantitative regularities of the deformation behavior of a spherical bearing with a different location and inclination angle of the antifriction layer. A number of topical problems encountered during the assessment of the performance bearings are considered in the work. The spherical bearings of the bridge span are investigated. Structures are load-bearing elements of transport systems. They perceive thermal power loads from the bridge span. The temperatu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The penalty function method and the Lagrange multiplier method are used in this analysis. The mixed-use extended Lagrange method is less sensitive to contact stiffness and relatively easy to converge [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. The contact stiffness FKN is taken as 0.8, and the contact intrusion tolerance coefficient is assumed to be 0.1.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis Of Supportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penalty function method and the Lagrange multiplier method are used in this analysis. The mixed-use extended Lagrange method is less sensitive to contact stiffness and relatively easy to converge [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. The contact stiffness FKN is taken as 0.8, and the contact intrusion tolerance coefficient is assumed to be 0.1.…”
Section: Finite Element Analysis Of Supportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum deformation of the interlayer at an h p = 8 mm thickness was established. The interlayer geometric arrangement in the spherical bearing of bridge structures plays an important role in the contact parameter distribution and the deformation behavior of the sliding layer [51]. The relevant task is to analyze the geometric parameters of structural elements, such as bearings.…”
Section: About the Geometric Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance and monitoring of the condition of the structure and its load-bearing elements are performed to increase the bridge life resource [4,5]. Also, one of the options for increasing the bearing capacity and bridge service life can be the selection of rational geometry and/or location of its important elements, including the rational geometry of the sliding layer [6], location of the bearing plate of a CEP pile [7], and rational geometry of lubricant recesses [8].…”
Section: Introduction 1research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bearing elements of a bridge support external loads. One of the variants of such structures is bridge bearings [6,8]. Due to the constant increase in the rate of urbanization, it is necessary to constantly improve the performance of bridge bearings by changing their geometric configuration [9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introduction 1research Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%