2015
DOI: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00673-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Theoretical Aspects in Credit Risk Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparative theoretical analysis is a method that compares and contrasts the components of two or more theories. Comparative analysis has been used, for example, to compare credit risk models (Kollár et al, 2015) and corporate laws (Dammann, 2013). Comparative theoretical analysis is an appropriate approach for this study because the purpose of the study is to identify and compare the aspects of shared value theory and public sphere theory.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative theoretical analysis is a method that compares and contrasts the components of two or more theories. Comparative analysis has been used, for example, to compare credit risk models (Kollár et al, 2015) and corporate laws (Dammann, 2013). Comparative theoretical analysis is an appropriate approach for this study because the purpose of the study is to identify and compare the aspects of shared value theory and public sphere theory.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those cases where the likely sample proportion was not known, p was set at 50%. The confidence interval was set at 5% (Lehutova et al, 2013, Kollar, 2015. In order to conduct a marketing survey of the perception of proximity marketing activities via Bluetooth technologies by consumers in the Slovak Republic, it is necessary to provide a sample of at least 385 respondents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%