For a long time, the global medical community has been discussing the issue of the strategic role of thrombolytic pharmacotherapy and percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Today, based on the results of large studies, the European Society of Cardiology recommends preferring invasive tactics to thrombolysis in case of infarction complication by cardiogenic shock or severe heart failure, regardless of the duration of the delay associated with the organization of endovascular intervention. Meanwhile, STEMI remains a frequent and lifethreatening condition requiring immediate reperfusion, and therefore, the sequential use of both tactics, as well as thrombolytic therapy alone, is actively being discussed, especially in areas where there is no hospital with the technical capability to perform endovascular dilation of the affected vascular segment. In this regard, the thrombus may remain the only pathogenetic link for action to restore myocardial blood supply. Recent studies of specific fibrinolytic agents have demonstrated good prospects and safety of alteplase and tenecteplase, in particular. Thus, given the already proven effectiveness of thrombolysis, as well as its speed of action and ease of implementation, in our opinion, further in-depth study and modification of approaches to the use of this group of drugs in clinical practice is necessary.