2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijmri.2018.095704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of thermal characterisation methodologies of a historical double leaf masonry wall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thermal envelope is made up of three classes of components: opaque components (walls, floors, ceilings and roof), windows, and internal solar shading devices. Each of these categories must be described utilising appropriate performance indicators defined by current laws and regulations [23,24]. Opaque components can be defined through indicators of steady-state and dynamic conditions, such as thermal transmittance and periodic thermal transmittance.…”
Section: Building Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal envelope is made up of three classes of components: opaque components (walls, floors, ceilings and roof), windows, and internal solar shading devices. Each of these categories must be described utilising appropriate performance indicators defined by current laws and regulations [23,24]. Opaque components can be defined through indicators of steady-state and dynamic conditions, such as thermal transmittance and periodic thermal transmittance.…”
Section: Building Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This catalog-based methodology is useful in estimating the energy performance of a building when the materials are known and included in the catalog. However, they are barely applicable in circumstances where either the material data are unknown or the structure of the building elements are highly variable, such as in restoration or refurbishment projects, with variances of up to 50% [ 15 ]. In this sense, several previous works have reported significant variability in thermal resistance estimation of up to 30% depending on the methodology used [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%