2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2010.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of transposable elements in the melanogaster subgroup sequenced genomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
81
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
10
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, tirant appears to be a newly identified active endogenous retrovirus of D. simulans, a species in which no other active endogenous retrovirus has been reported thus far. (12). These findings indicate that each strain of D. simulans studied possesses at least one potentially complete functional tirant env gene in its genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Therefore, tirant appears to be a newly identified active endogenous retrovirus of D. simulans, a species in which no other active endogenous retrovirus has been reported thus far. (12). These findings indicate that each strain of D. simulans studied possesses at least one potentially complete functional tirant env gene in its genome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…D. melanogaster and D. simulans are sibling species that can be intercrossed but contain substantial divergence. Alignable synonymous nucleotide sites are 12-13% diverged (Begun et al 2007), and the species are strikingly different in repetitive DNA content and heterochromatin, with D. simulans having substantially fewer transposable elements and less satellite DNA (Lohe and Roberts 1988;Bosco et al 2007;Lerat et al 2011). They also have experienced adaptive evolution in genes that are essential for chromosome segregation Anderson et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the D. melanogaster genome contains three times as many TEs as that of D. simulans, essentially because the copies of TEs found in the former species are mainly full-length. With respect to the number of TE fragments present, D. simulans displays a greater number than D. melanogaster, largely because most of the copies in the former species are degraded and consist of small fragments (Lerat et al, 2011). The Cyp flanking regions and the non-Cyp neighbors harbor a higher diversity of TEs, retrotransposons and DNA transposons in D. melanogaster than in D. simulans, which contains few insertions other than Gypsy and DNAREP1-like (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two species also exhibit different responses to insecticides (Windelspecht et al, 1995) and display different proportions of TEs within their genomic sequence, with three times as many TEs being found in D. melanogaster than in D. simulans (Dowsett and Young, 1982;Drosophila 12 genomes consortium, 2007;Hoskins et al, 2002;Kaminker et al, 2002;Vieira et al, 1999). However, the number of TE insertions in D. simulans is greater than in D. melanogaster because most of the copies in the former are degraded into small fragments (Lerat et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%