2014
DOI: 10.5633/amm.2014.0201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Analysis of Water Sorption by Different Acrylic Materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of the polymerization curve is necessary to establish the right amount of organic filler that can be introduced in the formulation to replace ATH, avoiding modifications in the exothermic curve compared to that of Duralight ® . In fact, a lower temperature peak and/or a delay result in an incomplete reaction in the material and, as a consequence, the presence of a higher porosity and therefore possibly higher absorption of liquids and lower physical and mechanical properties, which is well known on PMMA [ 19 , 20 ]. From the temperature vs. time curves reported in Figure 1 the following evidences can be outlined: Keeping constant the catalysts amount, the comparison of the rice husk exothermic peaks with the standard Duralight ® , makes visible that the reactivity peak obtained with 5 and 10% of rice husk is located in the reactivity range of Duralight ® .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of the polymerization curve is necessary to establish the right amount of organic filler that can be introduced in the formulation to replace ATH, avoiding modifications in the exothermic curve compared to that of Duralight ® . In fact, a lower temperature peak and/or a delay result in an incomplete reaction in the material and, as a consequence, the presence of a higher porosity and therefore possibly higher absorption of liquids and lower physical and mechanical properties, which is well known on PMMA [ 19 , 20 ]. From the temperature vs. time curves reported in Figure 1 the following evidences can be outlined: Keeping constant the catalysts amount, the comparison of the rice husk exothermic peaks with the standard Duralight ® , makes visible that the reactivity peak obtained with 5 and 10% of rice husk is located in the reactivity range of Duralight ® .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one should not disregard the fact that acrylate restorations release residual monomer, benzoyl peroxide, plasticizers, and other substances into the oral environment, which dissolve in saliva and act on oral tissues. Soft acrylate plasticizers are soluble in oral fluids and their predicted loss over time leads to the hardening of the material in the patient’s mouth [ 39 ].…”
Section: Physico-mechanical Properties Of Dental Acrylate Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%