2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09381-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of whole blood transcriptomics between European and local Caribbean pigs in response to feed restriction in a tropical climate

Abstract: Background Feed restriction occurs frequently during pig growth, either due to economic reasons or stressful environmental conditions. Local breeds are suggested to have better tolerance to periods of feed restriction. However, the mechanisms underlying the response to feed restriction in different breeds is largely unknown. The aims of the present study were (1) to compare the blood transcriptome profile in response to feed restriction and refeeding of two contrasted breeds, Large White (LW), … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results seem to indicate that each HSP as a tissue-dependent expression in accordance with previous findings [ 43 47 ]. As in the literature, different patterns of gene expression were found between HSP70 and HSP90 families in HS conditions, dependent of the tissue and/or the duration and level of HS [ 45 , 48 , 49 ], possibly being a proxy of a tissue-specific susceptibility to HS. In other words, we cannot totally exclude that tissue variations in the HSP expression on d4 and d5 could also reflect differences in their expression kinetics in the first days of exposure to 32 °C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These results seem to indicate that each HSP as a tissue-dependent expression in accordance with previous findings [ 43 47 ]. As in the literature, different patterns of gene expression were found between HSP70 and HSP90 families in HS conditions, dependent of the tissue and/or the duration and level of HS [ 45 , 48 , 49 ], possibly being a proxy of a tissue-specific susceptibility to HS. In other words, we cannot totally exclude that tissue variations in the HSP expression on d4 and d5 could also reflect differences in their expression kinetics in the first days of exposure to 32 °C.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%