2012
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of 5 methods (methylation‐specific polymerase chain reaction, methylight, pyrosequencing, methylation‐sensitive high‐resolution melting, and immunohistochemistry) to analyze O6‐methylguanine‐DNA‐methyltranferase in a series of 100 glioblastoma patients

Abstract: BACKGROUND: There is a strong need to determine the best technique for O 6 -methylguanine-DNA-methyltranferase (MGMT) analysis, because MGMT status is currently used in clinical trials and occasionally in routine clinical practice for glioblastoma patients. METHODS:The authors compared analytical performances and predictive values of 5 techniques in a series of 100 glioblastoma patients who received standard of care treatment (Stupp protocol). RESULTS: MGMT promoter was considered methylated in 33%, 33%, 42%, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
165
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
13
165
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Methylation of MGMT promoter was associated with a prolonged overall survival in patients with glioblastoma receiving TEM (Hegi et al 2005). Among the available techniques to assess MGMT promoter methylation, pyrosequencing appears to be the most robust (Karayan-Tapon et al 2010, Quillien et al 2012. Similar findings regarding the predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation were suggested in PNETs (Schmitt et al 2014, Walter et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Methylation of MGMT promoter was associated with a prolonged overall survival in patients with glioblastoma receiving TEM (Hegi et al 2005). Among the available techniques to assess MGMT promoter methylation, pyrosequencing appears to be the most robust (Karayan-Tapon et al 2010, Quillien et al 2012. Similar findings regarding the predictive value of MGMT promoter methylation were suggested in PNETs (Schmitt et al 2014, Walter et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Pyrosequencing is a technology yielding accurate and highly reproducible knowledge about methylation percentages at a CpG (Tost & Gut 2007, Quillien et al 2012. By analysing normal adrenals and neoplasms, we could quantify to which extent methylation in tumours deviated from normal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, DNA methylation is assessed by pyrosequencing, the most sensitive and accurate method to detect methylation at a single CpG (Quillien et al 2012). To the best of our knowledge, we analyse for the first time methylation in a number of different IGF2 regulatory regions in benign and malignant adrenal tumours.…”
Section: :9mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pyrosequencing was performed with the PyroMark Q96 MGMT kit on a PSQTM96 MA system, as previously described. 20 All the reagents were from Qiagen, Courtaboeuf,…”
Section: Mgmt Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For data analysis, the average percentage of the five CpGs was determined and the cutoff set at 8%. 20 What's new? Glioblastoma (GBM) is considered to be one of the most radio-resistant types of tumor.…”
Section: Mgmt Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%