2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-018-0526-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative assessment of soil erosion modelling approaches in a Himalayan watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated in the Methods section, the PCM was used to compute the criteria weights for each parameter using the AHP methodology. The rankings were decided on the basis of local knowledge of the area under consideration and the literature [37,73,93,[95][96][97][98]. The ratings and weightage used in this study were proven to be unbiased and reliable based on the observed value of CR = 0.07 in PCM (Table 4), which was in uniformity with the results obtained by [100].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As stated in the Methods section, the PCM was used to compute the criteria weights for each parameter using the AHP methodology. The rankings were decided on the basis of local knowledge of the area under consideration and the literature [37,73,93,[95][96][97][98]. The ratings and weightage used in this study were proven to be unbiased and reliable based on the observed value of CR = 0.07 in PCM (Table 4), which was in uniformity with the results obtained by [100].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The natural break classification was used in ArcGIS to optimize the arrangement of a set of values into "natural" classes. Five priority classes were used based on the available literature [73,[93][94][95][96][97][98]. Within each layer, a rating from very low (1) to very high (5) was assigned to the classes in increasing order of their qualitative importance for erosion [99].…”
Section: Weighted Sum Methods (Wsm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not possible to calculate the soil loss by using conventional methods due to the high cost, and because they are time consuming [47]. Therefore, the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) model is most widely used because it is simple, easy, and requires less data and time.…”
Section: The Anti-erosion Practical Factor (P)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main threats to wetlands in Srinagar city are attributed to anthropogenic pressures that include urbanization (Farooq and Muslim, 2014), land use changes (Fazal and Amin, 2011), and large-scale encroachments (Wani and Khairkar, 2011;Kuchay and Bhat, 2014) in the catchment as well as in the wetlands itself (Rather et al, 2016). Besides, natural siltation associated with the anthropogenic siltation brought about by deforestation in the catchment areas has also been an important factor resulting in the loss of wetlands (Pandit and Qadri, 1990;Pandit, 1991;Shah et al, 2017;Amin and Romshoo, 2019). Another important driver of the loss of wetlands comes in the form of problems relating to drainage (Romshoo et al, 2017;Alam et al, 2018).…”
Section: Threats To Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%