2018
DOI: 10.1128/aac.01880-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Assessment of Tedizolid Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Penetration between Diabetic Patients with Wound Infections and Healthy Volunteers via In Vivo Microdialysis

Abstract: Herein, we present pharmacokinetic and tissue penetration data for oral tedizolid in hospitalized patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI) compared with healthy volunteers. Participants received oral tedizolid phosphate 200 mg every 24 h for 3 doses to achieve steady state. A microdialysis catheter was inserted into the subcutaneous tissue near the margin of the wound for patients or into thigh tissue of volunteers. Following the third dose, 12 blood and 14 dialysate fluid samples were collected over 24 h … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…AUC from 0 to 24 h (AUC 0 -24 ) was 28.3 mg/liter • h for total concentrations, and the terminal half-life (t 1/2 ) was 11 h. These results are presented in Table 1 together with values found in recently published papers for comparison. The pharmacokinetic parameters are close to those previously reported, suggesting that this particularly restrictive type of bariatric surgery has a limited impact, if any, on tedizolid pharmacokinetics (2,8,9). AUC 0 -24 for unbound concentrations (fAUC 0 -24 ) was 5.40 mg/liter • h, corresponding to an average unbound fraction of 19%, consistent with previously published values (10).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…AUC from 0 to 24 h (AUC 0 -24 ) was 28.3 mg/liter • h for total concentrations, and the terminal half-life (t 1/2 ) was 11 h. These results are presented in Table 1 together with values found in recently published papers for comparison. The pharmacokinetic parameters are close to those previously reported, suggesting that this particularly restrictive type of bariatric surgery has a limited impact, if any, on tedizolid pharmacokinetics (2,8,9). AUC 0 -24 for unbound concentrations (fAUC 0 -24 ) was 5.40 mg/liter • h, corresponding to an average unbound fraction of 19%, consistent with previously published values (10).…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, no disparity in PK profiles was noted in morbidly obese patients compared to the nonobese subjects [23]. There were no significant Table 1 Pharmacokinetic parameters of tedizolid at a therapeutic dosage (200 mg/day) AUC 0-∞ AUC from zero to infinity, AUC 0-24 AUC from 0 to 24 hours, C max maximum concentration, IV intravenous, SD standard deviation from the mean, V d volume of distribution a AUC = area under the concentration-time curve Data from [4,5,15,18,20,21,25,28]…”
Section: Obese Populationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… AUC 0–∞ AUC from zero to infinity, AUC 0–24 AUC from 0 to 24 hours, C max maximum concentration, IV intravenous, SD standard deviation from the mean, V d volume of distribution a AUC = area under the concentration–time curve Data from [ 4 , 5 , 15 , 18 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 28 ] …”
Section: Pharmacokineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods for the quantification of TZD in plasma using HPLC have been reported [ 69 , 70 , 71 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 ]. In Japan, three reports were published in 2020–2021.…”
Section: Tdm Of Tedizolidmentioning
confidence: 99%