Comparative Assessment of Various Low-Dissipation Combined Models for Three-Terminal Heat Pump Systems

Abstract

Thermally driven heat pump systems play important roles in the utilization of low-grade thermal energy. In order to evaluate and compare the performances of three different constructions of thermally driven heat pump and heat transformer, the low-dissipation assumption has been adopted to establish the irreversible thermodynamic models of them in the present paper. By means of the proposed models, the heating loads, the coefficients of performance (COPs) and the optimal relations between them for various constructions are derived and discussed. The performances of different constructions are numerically assessed. More importantly, according to the results obtained, the upper and lower bounds of the COP at maximum heating load for different constructions are generated and compared by the introduction of a parameter measuring the deviation from the reversible limit of the system. Accordingly, the optimal constructions for the low-dissipation three-terminal heat pump and heat transformer are determined within the frame of low-dissipation assumption, respectively. The optimal constructions in accord with previous research and engineering practices for various three-terminal devices are obtained, which confirms the compatibility between the low-dissipation model and endoreversible model and highlights the validity of the application of low-dissipation model for multi-terminal thermodynamic devices. The proposed models and the significant results obtained enrich the theoretical thermodynamic model of thermally driven heat pump systems and may provide some useful guidelines for the design and operation of realistic thermally driven heat pump systems.

Four-Objective Optimization for an Irreversible Porous Medium Cycle with Linear Variation in Working Fluid’s Specific Heat

“…Finite time thermodynamics (FTT) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ] has been made significant progress in the research of thermal cycles and processes, including optimal configurations [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ] and optimal performances [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. The FTT studies of internal combustion engine cycles mostly focus on the following factors [ 33 ]: the effects of different loss models such as heat transfer loss (HTL) [ 34 ], friction loss (FL) [ 35 ] and internal irreversibility loss (IIL) [ 36 ] on the performances of cycles; the effects of power output ( ) and thermal efficiency ( ) [ 37 ], efficient power ( ) [ 38 ], ecological function ( ) [ 39 ], power density ( ) [ 40 ] and other ob...…”