2013
DOI: 10.1021/ef401295w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Assessment of Wet Torrefaction

Abstract: Wet torrefaction of typical Norwegian biomass fuels was studied within the temperature window of 175–225 °C, using a benchtop autoclave reactor of 250 mL in volume from Parr Instrument. Two types of local biomass fuels were employed as feedstock, Norway spruce (softwood) and birch (hardwood). Effects of process parameters including pressure, reaction temperature, holding time, and feedstock particle size on the yield and properties of the solid products were investigated. It appears that birch wood is more rea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
61
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
6
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in the table, the ash content of the neutral-processed sawdust sample (SN) decreased by 55% compared to the original sawdust. This agrees with the work of Bach et al, [14] who found a similar decrease in ash content during wet torrefaction of biomass. Presence of ash, usually in the form of alkali metals, is often responsible for boiler and heat-exchanger fouling during biomass combustion; hence the decrease in ash content during the production of SN showed that hydrothermal torrefaction of wet biomass may address this problem.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As shown in the table, the ash content of the neutral-processed sawdust sample (SN) decreased by 55% compared to the original sawdust. This agrees with the work of Bach et al, [14] who found a similar decrease in ash content during wet torrefaction of biomass. Presence of ash, usually in the form of alkali metals, is often responsible for boiler and heat-exchanger fouling during biomass combustion; hence the decrease in ash content during the production of SN showed that hydrothermal torrefaction of wet biomass may address this problem.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this introduction, we discussed the general goals and possible routes for biomass conversion and biorefineries with attention to the possibilities of 30 Chapter 2 using high-pressure CO 2 and CO 2 -H 2 O. These high-pressure systems have shown to be beneficial in multiple steps during the biomass conversion chain and offer the added benefit of being non-toxic, green and renewable solvents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Dry torrefaction, sometimes referred to as a mild pyrolysis, is performed under an inert environment at atmospheric pressure with a retention time around one hour at low temperatures (200 1C to 300 1C or 180 1C to 260 1C in case of wet torrefaction (WT)). 29,30 In both conditions the main product is bio-char or bio-coal, which is used as a feedstock for combustion or gasification. The advantage of this char over raw biomass is that its characteristics are more stable and that it has a higher energy density, which makes its transportation less environmentally and economically intensive.…”
Section: Main Biorefinery Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process, which is exothermic, generates three main products: gases, aqueous chemicals and a solid residue (hydrochar) [81] which is the main product of WT accounting for up to 88% of the mass and almost 90% of the energy in the raw biomass [82]. The mechanisms involved in the WT of biomass generally differ to the mechanism of the DT variant.…”
Section: Mw-induced Wet-torrefaction Of Biomassmentioning
confidence: 99%