Comparative Beneficiation Study of Gyel Columbite Ore Using Double Stage (Magnetic-to-Magnetic and Magnetic-to-Gravity) Separation Techniques

Abstract

The comparative beneficiation study of Gyel columbite ore using double stage (magnetic-to-magnetic and magnetic-to-gravity), located in the vicinity of Gyel village in Jos South Local Government Area of Plateau State to metallurgical grade was carried out. The ore sample was sourced from 20 different pits each 1.5 × 1.5 × 2 meters deep, 50 meter apart covering a land of 50 hectares. The samples from the 20 pits were crushed, pulverized and homogenized. 200 kg of the homogenized ore sample was used for the experiment and laboratory works. Chemical characterization of the ore sample was carried out using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (ED-XFR). Single and double stage concentration tests using magnetic and gravity methods were carried out respectively. The results of the chemical analysis of ore sample reveal that, Pit 1 contains 12.26% Nb2O5, 21.6% Fe 2 O 3 , 36.1% SiO 2 ; Pit 20 contains 4.78% Nb 2 O 5 , 19.34% Fe 2 O 3 , 23.96% SiO 2 and the homogenized sample contains 6.71% Nb 2 O 5 , 23.1% Fe 2 O 3 and 27.0% SiO 2 averagely. The liberation study reveals that the niobium of ore can be liberated over a range of sieve size fractions of −355 + 63 µm for the coarse and −63 + 45 µm for the fine particle size fractions. On the basis of this, sieve size fractions of −1400 + 355 µm (as coarse size), −355 + 90 µm (as medium size) and −90 + 45 µm (as fine size) were used for the concentration tests. The concentration test using the double stage processes revealed that the air-floatation followed by rapid magnetic method produced a concentrate with the highest percent assay of 54.48% Nb2O5 with a recovery of 96.53% * Corresponding author. followed by the rapid-to-rapid magnetic method which produced a concentrate assaying 52.12% Nb 2 O 5 with a recovery of 86.96%. These results meet and surpass the 50% Nb 2 O 5 stipulated as the acceptable metallurgical grade concentrate for niobium metal production in the literature.

Extraction of a low grade zinc ore using gravity and froth flotation methods

“…25%. Alabi et al (2016) and Davis (1991). This was fed into the charging chamber of Humphrey Spiral Concentrator Model B124TA at a feed rate of 50 liters per hour and its valve set at 2cm wide.…”

Investigating the Production of Ultrafine Engineering Material from Low-Grade Gariti Barite Ore Using Gravity Concentration Methods

“…A lid was also placed on top of the highest sieve to prevent the sample from escaping. The sieves were agitated for 30 minutes using an automated sieve shaker type EFL2mk11 [2]. Each sieve's retained particle weight was weighed.…”

Physical beneficiation of heavy minerals – Part 2: A state of the art literature review on magnetic and electrostatic concentration techniques

“…These physical separators can either operate with low or high magnetic field intensities [ 9 , 48 , 49 ]. There have been several reports that the gradient of magnetic field is not considered in this situation; and hence, one can say that the high intensity magnetic separators (HIMS) may generate high magnetic field gradient and usually referred to as high gradient magnetic equipment; whilst low intensity magnetic separators (LIMS) may be referred to as low gradient magnetic equipment, and generates low magnetic field gradient [ [9] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] , [59] , [60] , [61] ]. Nonetheless, this rule may have some exceptions.…”