2013
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1348223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Bioequivalence Study of Two Marketed Formulation of Betamethasone Injectable Suspensions

Abstract: Based on the 90% CIs of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ in these healthy Iranian male subjects, the test and reference formulations of betamethasone injectable suspension met the regulatory requirements for bioequivalence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma BET concentrations after IM administration (Figure 5) were high during the first 24 h after administration and, then, decreased, being detected in all volunteers up to 96 h after administration at very low concentrations. Plasmatic concentrations obtained are in agreement with previous published data 29–31 . Different recovery profiles of CORT secretion were observed depending on the volunteer, starting for some of the volunteers in the period 72–96 h after administration, although for some volunteers, the complete recovery to basal values is achieved after 10–15 days (Figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Plasma BET concentrations after IM administration (Figure 5) were high during the first 24 h after administration and, then, decreased, being detected in all volunteers up to 96 h after administration at very low concentrations. Plasmatic concentrations obtained are in agreement with previous published data 29–31 . Different recovery profiles of CORT secretion were observed depending on the volunteer, starting for some of the volunteers in the period 72–96 h after administration, although for some volunteers, the complete recovery to basal values is achieved after 10–15 days (Figure S2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The kinetics of betamethasone obtained following i.m. administration of the dual formulation showed considerable interstudy variability: there was up to 5.8‐fold difference in drug exposure across four independent, healthy‐volunteer studies ( Table S4 ). One potential cause of the large interstudy variability is likely to be sample stability, as plasma samples needed to be stabilized with the addition of a phosphatase/esterase inhibitor .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%