“…The corollary of grouping muscles by function, therefore, is that it may be necessary to model a single muscle as two separate functional units, particularly when osteological evidence suggests the presence of two When subdividing fan-shaped muscles, the criteria for selecting the number and location of multiple lines of action are not always made clear, and may be related to position ('superficial' vs. 'deep'), perceived function, or selected in order to capture differing fiber directions within the muscle. The practice of partitioning muscles with large attachment sites is common in human biomechanical modelling (Delp et al, 1990;van der Helm and Veenbaas, 1991;Holzbaur et al, 2005;Chadwick et al, 2009;Arnold et al, 2010;Webb et al, 2012) and is increasingly applied to other extant taxa, particularly in MBDA of skull function (Wroe et al, 2007(Wroe et al, , 2013Gröning et al, 2013;Watson et al, 2014). Modern studies benefit from the incorporation of dissection data and MRI-based imaging of in-situ 3D muscle geometry when subdividing muscles for this purpose.…”