2006
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Developmental Neurotoxicity of Organophosphate Insecticides: Effects on Brain Development Are Separable from Systemic Toxicity

Abstract: A comparative approach to the differences between systemic toxicity and developmental neurotoxicity of organophosphates is critical to determine the degree to which multiple mechanisms of toxicity carry across different members of this class of insecticides. We contrasted neuritic outgrowth and cholinergic synaptic development in neonatal rats given different organophosphates (chlorpyrifos, diazinon, parathion) at doses spanning the threshold for impaired growth and viability. Animals were treated daily on pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
190
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
9
190
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…CPF and DZN (both from Chem Service, West Chester, PA) were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide to provide consistent absorption [109] and were injected subcutaneously in a volume of 1 ml/kg once daily on postnatal days 1-4; control animals received equivalent injections of the dimethylsulfoxide vehicle. For both agents, we utilized doses below the threshold for growth retardation and systemic toxicity [16,91,109]: 1 mg/kg for CPF and 1 or 2 mg/kg for DZN. This CPF treatment and the higher dose of DZN produce neurotoxicity in developing rat brain while eliciting less than 20% cholinesterase inhibition, well below the 70% threshold necessary for symptoms of cholinergic hyperstimulation [20], whereas the lower dose of DZN produces no measurable inhibition in male neonates [86,87,97,100,109].…”
Section: Animal Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…CPF and DZN (both from Chem Service, West Chester, PA) were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide to provide consistent absorption [109] and were injected subcutaneously in a volume of 1 ml/kg once daily on postnatal days 1-4; control animals received equivalent injections of the dimethylsulfoxide vehicle. For both agents, we utilized doses below the threshold for growth retardation and systemic toxicity [16,91,109]: 1 mg/kg for CPF and 1 or 2 mg/kg for DZN. This CPF treatment and the higher dose of DZN produce neurotoxicity in developing rat brain while eliciting less than 20% cholinesterase inhibition, well below the 70% threshold necessary for symptoms of cholinergic hyperstimulation [20], whereas the lower dose of DZN produces no measurable inhibition in male neonates [86,87,97,100,109].…”
Section: Animal Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in addition to being informative about the underlying disparities in the regional expression of various gene families in the developing brain, the correspondence of these patterns to known maturational and anatomic differences serves as a validation for the overall approach taken here. The regional dissimilarities also interact with the effects of CPF and DZN, likely contributing to the ultimate differences in the regional targeting of neurotransmitter systems by these two organophosphates [50,86,87,89,91,97].…”
Section: Gene Expression In Normal Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Low-level exposure to chlorpyrifos has caused adverse developmental effects in human pregnancies, such as low birth weight and reduced head circumference. 7,8 Chlorpyrifos is also considered to be an endocrine disrupting compound, 9 and some recent studies have shown an association between chlorpyrifos exposure and both lung and prostate cancer. 10,11 Exposure assessment using probabilistic techniques have been shown to be an effective tool in environmental health risk assessment, in which the exposure values are presented in cumulative probability distributions rather than the traditional single-point exposure estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%