2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03506-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative diagnostic accuracy of respective nuclear imaging for suspected fracture-related infection: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nuclear imaging was available at all participating centers and all centers used the same imaging protocols [6] . WBC scan had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 85%, which are lower than the pooled sensitivity and specificity rates described in a recent systematic review (86% and 96%, respectively) [21] . In the same systematic review 18 F-FDG-PET was associated with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 79% [21] .…”
Section: Article In Presscontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nuclear imaging was available at all participating centers and all centers used the same imaging protocols [6] . WBC scan had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 85%, which are lower than the pooled sensitivity and specificity rates described in a recent systematic review (86% and 96%, respectively) [21] . In the same systematic review 18 F-FDG-PET was associated with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 79% [21] .…”
Section: Article In Presscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…WBC scan had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 85%, which are lower than the pooled sensitivity and specificity rates described in a recent systematic review (86% and 96%, respectively) [21] . In the same systematic review 18 F-FDG-PET was associated with a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 79% [21] . In our study, the sensitivity and specificity of 18 F-FDG-PET were 65.2% and 100%, respectively.…”
Section: Article In Presscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…To address this question scientifically, an updated pairwise meta-analysis was performed and the pooled results demonstrated that 18 F-FDG PET and PET/CT had satisfactory accuracy (sensitivity = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84–0.95; specificity = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.79–0.95) in identifying or excluding suspected pyogenic spondylitis. These results are partly consistent with the previously reported accuracy of this imaging technique for diagnosing suspected fracture-related infection and periprosthetic joint infection [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET) and PET/CT can be used to appraise increased glucose uptake and therefore are usually recommended to diagnose, stage, and detect the recurrence or progression of the malignant tumors [11]. Studies using this nuclear imaging technique to assess infection/inflammation are growing in recent years, especially for musculoskeletal infections [12]. Compared to CT and MRI, 18 F-FDG PET and PET/CT provide the advantages of whole-body coverage to detect unintended metastasis of infection, and fewer artifacts due to metallic implants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy have shown a very high sensitivity in a recent meta-analysis to diagnose fracture related infections [19], in our analysis, both types of imaging failed to detect SII when caused by C. acnes. Probably due to the low-grade inflammation caused by C. acnes, these nuclear imaging modalities lack diagnostic power, as demonstrated also for chronic shoulder PJIs [20].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%