2017
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.000478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative diagnostic test evaluation of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in suspected bloodstream infections in children with cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results were confirmed by other working groups in non-neutropenic cancer patients with SIRS or in FN patients with or without proven infection [45,46]. However, procalcitonin (PCT) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) presented a promising performance for identifying microbiologically confirmed bacteraemia, which was recently also observed in other neutropenia settings, including paediatric patients [47][48][49]. Presepsin (sCD14) might be used in addition to PCT to detect bacteraemia in these patients, which might have a better discriminatory capacity [49].…”
Section: Sepsis Biomarkers In Neutropenic Systemic Inflammatory Resposupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our results were confirmed by other working groups in non-neutropenic cancer patients with SIRS or in FN patients with or without proven infection [45,46]. However, procalcitonin (PCT) and lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) presented a promising performance for identifying microbiologically confirmed bacteraemia, which was recently also observed in other neutropenia settings, including paediatric patients [47][48][49]. Presepsin (sCD14) might be used in addition to PCT to detect bacteraemia in these patients, which might have a better discriminatory capacity [49].…”
Section: Sepsis Biomarkers In Neutropenic Systemic Inflammatory Resposupporting
confidence: 85%
“…One study evaluated the use of serum CRP and PCT levels in children with cancer, with PCT found to be a better marker than CPR for excluding bloodstream infections (AUC was 0.751 for PCT and 0.638 for CRP). [ 21 ] Another study suggested that PCT was superior to CRP for predicting bacteremia in 92 patients with suspected sepsis (AUC was 0.876 for PCT and 0.602 for CRP). [ 22 ] Significant differences in PCT and CRP levels have also been observed between patients with positive and negative blood cultures (AUC was 0.720 for PCT and 0.558 for CRP), indicating that PCT was also superior to CRP for these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Procalcitonin (PCT) is an inactive propeptide substance of calcitonin. As a systemic inflammatory reaction indicator, it is superior to other inflammatory indicators in the judgement of bacterial infection 11–13 . Existing studies have shown that its concentration is not susceptible to the impacts of immunodeficiency and use of corticosteroids 14,15 , but whether it is susceptible to tumour factors remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%