2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcz.2017.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative ecogeographical variation in skull size and shape of two species of woolly opossums (genus Caluromys)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suggestions of a constraint on marsupial skull shape through static allometry are at odds with several geometric morphometric studies that show only low or moderate levels of static allometry in marsupial crania [15,[20][21][22]. Two recent studies on kangaroos even suggested that allometry plays a lesser role in shaping cranial variation in this group, instead positing fast adaptation or individual developmental plasticity of the masticatory apparatus as the main driver [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suggestions of a constraint on marsupial skull shape through static allometry are at odds with several geometric morphometric studies that show only low or moderate levels of static allometry in marsupial crania [15,[20][21][22]. Two recent studies on kangaroos even suggested that allometry plays a lesser role in shaping cranial variation in this group, instead positing fast adaptation or individual developmental plasticity of the masticatory apparatus as the main driver [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CREA-like shape variation is also found in other kangaroo species, and is allometric in tammar wallabies [60] and quokkas [20], but only partially so among the rock wallabies [15]. By contrast, geometric morphometric analyses of two marsupial species with a comparatively soft dietthe insectivorous Dromiciops gliroides and two species of the omnivorous Caluromys -show little cranial variation of zygomatic arch or rostrum shape, but strong-species allometry [21,22]. The variable association of the CREA shape variation with allometry may therefore be related to varying biomechanical stresses on individual skulls depending on a species' feeding ecology (but note that CREA has been shown within mongooses and fruit bats, which both do not feed on hard items [59]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Partitions not expected to vary were the rest of the cranium (501 landmarks) or mandible (400 22 landmarks) (Additional File 10). To account for different landmark numbers per partition, we also rarefied each partition to the minimum landmark number (66/cranium and 35/mandible).…”
Section: Partition Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The utility of interpreting SDMs outcomes in the light of relevant, but independently conducted, phylogenetic analyses is widely recognized and often practiced; but lacking a methodological framework to fully integrate the two, comparison is usually undertaken in a qualitative manner after separate and sequential model building (e.g. Graham et al, 2004;Rivera et al, 2011;Martínez and Di Cola, 2011;Brown and Knowles, 2012;Bornholdt et al, 2013;Paz et al, 2015;Dianat et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2016;Magnus et al, 2017;Camacho et al, 2017). Although phylogenies have yet to become nested components of SDMs, they have been routinely applied during linear regression as tools to account for species non−independence when evaluating the relationship between species traits and between traits and environmental variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%