1965
DOI: 10.1002/cpt196562139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effect in human subjects of chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, and placebo on mental and physical performance

Abstract: Two tranquilizers, chlordiazepoxide and diazepam, and placebo medication were studied in 18 subjects for their effects on mental and motor performance with and without small amounts of ethanol. Attentive motor performance was measured with a pursuit meter developed by the authors. Ethanol was the only drug used alone that impaired motor performance. Over‐all drug‐alcohol interaction was not significant with diazepam or chlordiazepoxide. However, in one pattern, a synergistic effect of diazepam with alcohol occ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jaattela, significant changes were reported in a group of ten Mannist6, Paatero & Tuomisto (1971) using two subjects in card sorting and digit symbol substihundred and seventy medical students, showed tution by Malpas & Joyce (1969) except after impairment in digit symbol substitution and short term memory following diazepam (10 mg) in men, while in women impairment occurred on the former test only. In the study by Idestr6m & Schalling (1970) few significant changes occurred in a battery of short tests performed by groups of twenty-two subjects following amylobarbitone sodium (150 mg), but changes were more apparent after 300 mg. Hughes, Forney & Richards (1965) failed to obtain significant impairment in verbal and arithmetic tests after diazepam (6 mg) in a group of eighteen subjects. Haffner, M0rland, Setekleiv, Str0msaether, Danielson, Frivik & Dybing (1973), using a group of eight subjects, examined the effect of diazepam (10 and 20 mg) on a series of short tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Jaattela, significant changes were reported in a group of ten Mannist6, Paatero & Tuomisto (1971) using two subjects in card sorting and digit symbol substihundred and seventy medical students, showed tution by Malpas & Joyce (1969) except after impairment in digit symbol substitution and short term memory following diazepam (10 mg) in men, while in women impairment occurred on the former test only. In the study by Idestr6m & Schalling (1970) few significant changes occurred in a battery of short tests performed by groups of twenty-two subjects following amylobarbitone sodium (150 mg), but changes were more apparent after 300 mg. Hughes, Forney & Richards (1965) failed to obtain significant impairment in verbal and arithmetic tests after diazepam (6 mg) in a group of eighteen subjects. Haffner, M0rland, Setekleiv, Str0msaether, Danielson, Frivik & Dybing (1973), using a group of eight subjects, examined the effect of diazepam (10 and 20 mg) on a series of short tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Critical flicker fusion frequency was reduced and body sway was reduced. Hughes et al (1965) found chlordiazepoxide (15 mg daily) to have no effect on their sample of 18 graduate students. Although the dosage implications of this finding are consistent with the trends suggested by the studies of Idestrom & Cadenius (1963) and of Holmberg & William-Olsson (1963), it should be noted that they did not use the same criteria of psychomotor effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the basis of such statistics Havard (1970) considered that in the United Kingdom some 3-5% of drivers (that is some 500,000 drivers in all) are taking psychoactive drugs at any given time. (Landauer, Milner & Patman, 1969;Linnoila, Saario & Mattila, 1974) and attention tests (Hughes, Forney & Richards, 1965), which have only a superficial relevance to driving. While such techniques may reveal significant drug effects (Milner & Landauer, 1971), these effects are, in the case of the benzodiazepines at least, too variable for any consistent pattern to emerge (Greenblatt & Shader, 1974).…”
Section: Drugs and Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%