2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effectiveness and safety of antiviral agents for patients with COVID-19: Protocol for a systematic review and individual-patient data network meta-analysis

Abstract: Background A recent cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan, China, has been caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We propose the protocol described below to perform an individual-patient data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) in order to evaluate the efficacies of different antiviral drugs to treat patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Materials and methods We will search the Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, SinoMed, CNKI and VIP databases from their inceptions t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…39,41,42 We are aware of only 4 additional published IPD meta-analyses for COVID-19 therapeutics (3 planned; 1 smaller one completed). [43][44][45][46] Two metaanalyses planned to use IPD data to supplement aggregate data but could not obtain them. 41,47 At least 50 aggregate data meta-analyses evaluating HCQ/CQ in hospitalized COVID-19 patients have been published, with the overwhelming majority finding lack of evidence of convincing clinical benefit, and many finding worse clinical outcomes and increased AE rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…39,41,42 We are aware of only 4 additional published IPD meta-analyses for COVID-19 therapeutics (3 planned; 1 smaller one completed). [43][44][45][46] Two metaanalyses planned to use IPD data to supplement aggregate data but could not obtain them. 41,47 At least 50 aggregate data meta-analyses evaluating HCQ/CQ in hospitalized COVID-19 patients have been published, with the overwhelming majority finding lack of evidence of convincing clinical benefit, and many finding worse clinical outcomes and increased AE rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,41,42 We are aware of only 4 additional published IPD meta-analyses for COVID-19 therapeutics (3 planned; 1 smaller one completed). 4346 Two meta-analyses planned to use IPD data to supplement aggregate data but could not obtain them. 41,47…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One IPD-MA was limited to studies in the US and Canada, [27] another to the US, Europe, and China, [28] and one to China. [29] Treatment or exposure Sixteen IPD-MAs focused on the evaluation of medical treatments, including antivirals (n=6), [13,16,[29][30][31][32] antibodies (n=4), [19,24,33,34] angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs; n=2), [27,35] convalescent plasma (n=2), [36,37] COVID-19 vaccines (n=1), [38] and the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-vaccine (n=1). [26] One IPD-MA focused on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).…”
Section: Study Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%