2018
DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effectiveness of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of clinical stage IIIb lung adenocarcinoma patients with mutant EGFR

Abstract: BackgroundThe standard of care for fit locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, in a subset of patients with lung adenocarcinoma with mutant EGFR (LA‐mEGFR), the role of EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is not clear. We compared CCRT versus TKIs for the treatment of stage IIIb LA‐mEGFR in a Taiwanese population.MethodsWe identified patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry with good performance status at clinical stage IIIb LA‐mEGFR, dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A retrospective study assessed whether EGFR TKI (n=177) could substitute the cCT-RT (n=22) in stage III EGFR -mutant NSCLC patients. The study did not find differences in OS (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.34–1.47) or lung cancer-specific survival (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.31–1.35), yielding a 5-year OS of 30% and 25%, respectively ( 33 ). The limited number of patients and the retrospective nature of this analysis do not lead to obtain firm conclusions whether EGFR TKI alone may be the preferred treatment option instead of the cCT-RT in EGFR -mutant unresectable stage III NSCLC.…”
Section: Personalized Treatment In Locally-advanced Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective study assessed whether EGFR TKI (n=177) could substitute the cCT-RT (n=22) in stage III EGFR -mutant NSCLC patients. The study did not find differences in OS (HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.34–1.47) or lung cancer-specific survival (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.31–1.35), yielding a 5-year OS of 30% and 25%, respectively ( 33 ). The limited number of patients and the retrospective nature of this analysis do not lead to obtain firm conclusions whether EGFR TKI alone may be the preferred treatment option instead of the cCT-RT in EGFR -mutant unresectable stage III NSCLC.…”
Section: Personalized Treatment In Locally-advanced Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the majority of LUAD patients are diagnosed in the advanced stages and cannot be treated with surgery due to the presence of distant metastasis [ 35 ]. Although chemoradiotherapy can improve symptoms, the adverse reactions are significant [ 36 ]. Therefore, attempts at improving the survival rate of patients have become the main purpose of LUAD treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 In addition, the optimal treatment is less clear for a subset of patients with NSCLC with mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), as reported in our previous first nonrandomized population-based study utilizing TCR. 24 Therefore, we did an additional SA for SCLC (SA-2), NSCLC with wild-type EGFR (SA-3) or NSCLC with mutant EGFR (SA-4). In SA-5, we included three additional potential covariates addressed by reviewers during revision to examine the robustness of our findings.…”
Section: Statistical and Subgroup Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%