2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2256-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effectiveness research across two spine registries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several nation-wide registration systems for spinal surgery have been established in Sweden (Swespine) (Strömqvist and Jönsson 1993;Jansson et al 2003Jansson et al , 2004Jansson et al , 2005Öhrn et al 2011;Strömqvist et al 2013;Fritzell et al 2015), in Norway (NORspine) (Solberg et al 2013;Fredø et al 2014;Grotle et al 2014), in Switzerland (SWISSspine) (Schluessmann et al 2009;Aghayev et al 2012;Hübschle et al 2014), in Turkey (Utku et al 2010) and United Kingdom (Breakwell et al 2015). Except Swespine since 1992, they have a relatively shorter history.…”
Section: Nation-wide Spinal Surgery Registrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several nation-wide registration systems for spinal surgery have been established in Sweden (Swespine) (Strömqvist and Jönsson 1993;Jansson et al 2003Jansson et al , 2004Jansson et al , 2005Öhrn et al 2011;Strömqvist et al 2013;Fritzell et al 2015), in Norway (NORspine) (Solberg et al 2013;Fredø et al 2014;Grotle et al 2014), in Switzerland (SWISSspine) (Schluessmann et al 2009;Aghayev et al 2012;Hübschle et al 2014), in Turkey (Utku et al 2010) and United Kingdom (Breakwell et al 2015). Except Swespine since 1992, they have a relatively shorter history.…”
Section: Nation-wide Spinal Surgery Registrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A complete documentation of a gold standard procedure like fusion in a national registry would need additional and substantial administrative and financial efforts, which were considered even less feasible. A cost-effective solution to this weakness is, e.g., a cross-registry comparison that has recently been undertaken for lumbar TDA in the SWISSspine and anterior interbody fusion in the Spine Tango registry [38]. A within registry benchmarking is also possible as this has been shown for lumbar TDA in the SWISSspine registry [39].…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 The true comparator for the lumbar TDR is regarded to be anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) due to the similar surgical approach to the vertebral column and the solely anterior rigid or dynamic stabilization of the respective spinal segments. 4 New generation disc implants attempt to better mimic the viscoelastic function of the natural discs with potentially more patient benefits in comparison to the "hard" first generation disc implants. They have been developed and introduced into clinical practice in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Comparative effectiveness studies of different fusion types and TDRs are extremely rare today. 4 Randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing fusion and TDR are rare and have a high administrative burden. 2 Wei et al found six such RCTs in their meta-analysis, whereas only two trials used ALIF as comparator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation