1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-6226(97)00142-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effects of dietary fat and fibre in Alentejano and Large White piglets: Digestibility, digestive enzymes and metabolic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
17
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was a noticeable increase in N retention in both breeds as N intake increased, indicated by regression analysis which never deviated from linearity, even in Cinta Senese. The lower N utilization of Cinta Senese compared to Large White is in accordance with studies by Acciaioli et al (2003) and studies by Freire et al (1998) with Alentejano (another local breed) compared to modern genotype pig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, there was a noticeable increase in N retention in both breeds as N intake increased, indicated by regression analysis which never deviated from linearity, even in Cinta Senese. The lower N utilization of Cinta Senese compared to Large White is in accordance with studies by Acciaioli et al (2003) and studies by Freire et al (1998) with Alentejano (another local breed) compared to modern genotype pig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This discrepancy can be due to the fact that in the latter trial pigs of the two breeds were coetaneous, while in the present one they had the same weight and consequently Cinta Senese pigs, being older than Large White, could have improved their digestive ability. As concerns other local pigs, Freire et al (1998) found that new weaned piglets of Alentejano breed had higher TTAD for some dietary components (fat and acid detergent fibre) than Large White ones but the wide difference in age with the subjects of the present study does not allow to draw a comparison. On the other hand, Morales et al (2002), on barrows of 88 kg of body weight, found higher apparent digestibility for organic matter in Landrace than in Iberian breed whereas no difference was found for crude protein.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In accordance, Morales et al (2002) reported that Iberian pigs had lower gut content compared with Landrace pigs, resulting in shorter transit time of digesta. Earlier studies on indigenous and exotic pig breeds support the contention of greater length of the GIT in the indigenous pigs (Freire et al, 1998;Len et al, 2009a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These observations on Iberian pigs could apply to tropical pig breeds, especially those from Latin America. The high fibre digestibility of native breeds is also explained by a better adaptation to the high fibre content ascribable to high digestive enzyme activity and better adaptation of hindgut microbiota to degrade cell wall constituents of the diet (Freire et al, 1998 and, greater size of the gastrointestinal tract and longer retention time (Ngoc et al, 2013). The ability of indigenous pigs to digest fibrous fractions is more pronounced in high-fibre diets (Len et al, 2009b), which takes place in the hindgut because ileal digestibility of a high-fibre diet is usually similar between breeds in the same trial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%