1992
DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.1992.10.0021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative effects of posture on pressure and shear at the body-seat interface

Abstract: Abstract-This study considers the effects of seated posture and body orientation on the pressure-distribution and surface shear (tangential) forces acting at the bodyseat interface. Nine postures typically assumed by wheelchair users were studied. Comparisons were made within and between two study groups, made up of 12 subjects with spinal cord injuries (SCI) and 10 nondisabled subjects. Both interface pressure and the surface shear were measured simultaneously in each of nine reproducible, seated postures. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
127
1
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
127
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 shows characteristic con®gurations of these three ready-made wheelchair cushions. The polyurethane foam cushion had a medium density 10 and a¯at sitting surface. The silicone gel¯otation consisted of a 5 cm thick silicone gel pad sandwiched between polyurethane foam pads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows characteristic con®gurations of these three ready-made wheelchair cushions. The polyurethane foam cushion had a medium density 10 and a¯at sitting surface. The silicone gel¯otation consisted of a 5 cm thick silicone gel pad sandwiched between polyurethane foam pads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were tested for (intra-observer) reliability with an ICC (3,1) . With the exception of the 2 kg weight (ICC (3,1) =0.56 [95% CI=0.47 ± 0.64]), all reliabilities were good (ICC (3,1) 40.75), mean ICC (3,1) =0.85 (95% CI=0.74 ± 0.95), range: 0.56 ± 0.93 (95% CI=0.47 ± 0.95). The mean of all mean-pressures was 7.5 (+4.9) mmHg and the mean of all maximum (peak-) pressures was 20.6 (+7.9) mmHg (see Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 We performed ICC (3,1) calculations as measure of intrarater reliability for the calibration measurements and ICC (2,1) calculations as measure of inter-rater reliability for both studied groups. Portney and Watkins 32 de®ned an ICC (2,1) 40.75 to be good and an ICC (2,1) 50.75 to be poor/moderate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations