2001
DOI: 10.1093/bja/87.5.718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative efficacy and safety of remifentanil and fentanyl in ‘fast track’ coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized, double-blind study

Abstract: This multi-centre, parallel group, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of high-dose remifentanil administered by continuous infusion with an intermittent bolus fentanyl regimen, when given in combination with propofol for general anaesthesia in 321 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A significantly lower proportion of the patients who received remifentanil had responses to maximal sternal spread (the primary efficacy endpoint) compared with those who … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
47
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
47
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We were able to retrieve 220 articles, 104 of which met the inclusion criteria [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. We eliminated 116 of the retrieved studies for the following reasons: two were review articles, 10 did not compare remifentanil with other opioids, nine were not randomised trials, 37 did not have relevant data or had data that could not be extrapolated from the published graphs, five did not mention the number of patients per group, 11 did not use general anaesthesia, 10 included data from children (age less than 18 years) and 20 used different anaesthetics in the remifentanil and comparator group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We were able to retrieve 220 articles, 104 of which met the inclusion criteria [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. We eliminated 116 of the retrieved studies for the following reasons: two were review articles, 10 did not compare remifentanil with other opioids, nine were not randomised trials, 37 did not have relevant data or had data that could not be extrapolated from the published graphs, five did not mention the number of patients per group, 11 did not use general anaesthesia, 10 included data from children (age less than 18 years) and 20 used different anaesthetics in the remifentanil and comparator group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we included studies in which rigid bronchoscopy or laryngoscopy was conducted under general anaesthesia without intubation. If remifentanil use extended into the postoperative period, we only extracted the intra-operative data [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Reports were excluded if remifentanil was used for sedation and analgesia for patients in the intensive care unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have included combination of low dose propofol, ketamine, midazolam as induction agent, fentanyl as opioid and vecuronium as muscle relaxant. The most common induction agent is propofol in combination with an opioid, usually at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg with 10mg boluses until loss of consciousness 17,21,22,23,24 although some use propofol in higher doses 2,5,25 or even start directly with an infusion. 26 Etomidate, thiopentone and ketamine are described as being used.…”
Section: Methods Of Ftcamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He also showed a significantly decreased time to extubation with no increase in the incidence of ischaemia or postoperative myocardial infarction. Since then propofol has been used commonly in cardiac anaesthesia, either as part of a total intravenous anaesthetic technique 5,23,28 or as sedation on CPB and continuing into the ICU. 2,5,17,22,24,25,26 The most common agent used for sedation of these patients post bypass and into the ICU is propofol.…”
Section: Methods Of Ftcamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation