2010
DOI: 10.1038/gt.2010.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative efficacy of dermal fibroblast-mediated and direct adenoviral bone morphogenetic protein-2 gene therapy for bone regeneration in an equine rib model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2,3] However, using viral vectorbased technology possesses numerous disadvantages not least the known safety concerns associated with insertational mutagenesis following viral integration [4] and the adverse immune responses observed in patients. [5] Additional problems include the time consuming and labour intensive process involved in Innovative Collagen Nano-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Offer a Highly Efficient Non-Viral Gene Delivery Platform for Stem Cell-Mediated Bone Formation the production of such viruses, thereby limiting their potential for tissue engineering.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201103828mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,3] However, using viral vectorbased technology possesses numerous disadvantages not least the known safety concerns associated with insertational mutagenesis following viral integration [4] and the adverse immune responses observed in patients. [5] Additional problems include the time consuming and labour intensive process involved in Innovative Collagen Nano-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds Offer a Highly Efficient Non-Viral Gene Delivery Platform for Stem Cell-Mediated Bone Formation the production of such viruses, thereby limiting their potential for tissue engineering.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201103828mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, BMSCs were engineered with the adenovirus expressing BMP7 (AdBMP7), seeded into scaffolds and implanted into the critical-size (25 mm in length) segmental femoral defects in goats [32]. Alternatively, equine dermal fibroblasts engineered with the adenovirus expressing BMP2 (AdBMP2) were directly injected into the equine rib drill defects [33] or into horses with metacarpal/metatarsal osteotomies [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ad-BMP2 gene transfer induced greater bone regeneration in mice calvarial bone defects than Ad-Runx2 [63] DFb Ad-BMP2 Improved bone regeneration in equine metatarsal defects [64] DFb Ad-BMP2 Improved bone regeneration in equine rib drill defects [65] DFb Retro-BMP2 Ectopic bone formation in mice [66] DFb Ad-BMP7 Improved bone regeneration in rat cranial defects [67] DFb Ad-LMP3 Spine fusion and improved mandible defect regeneration in mice [68] DFb and BMD-MSC Ad-BMP2 Comparison of ectopic bone formation between DFb and BMD MSC in mice [69] Blood Buffy coat cells Ad-LMP1 Ectopic bone formation in rats [18] Buffy coat cells Ad-LMP1 Spine fusion in rabbits [70] Umbilical cord blood-derived MSC N/A Cells administered with beta-tricalcium phosphate improved the canine radial defect regeneration [71] Peripheral blood mononuclear cells N/A Cells administered with osteoinductive supplements improved the rat calvarial defect regeneration [72] Ad shown to undergo multilineage differentiation into bone, and cartilage, neuron, endothelial and hematopoietic tissues [79]. Unlike BMD-MSC, muscle-derived inducible osteoprogenitors do not express osteogenic markers until exposed to BMP2 [56]; therefore, the MDSC should be used in combination with osteoinductive factors to achieve full osteogenic potential.…”
Section: Viralmentioning
confidence: 98%