2021
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000026455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative efficacy of different types of antihypertensive drugs in reversing left ventricular hypertrophy as determined with echocardiography in hypertensive patients

et al.

Abstract: Background: Reversing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) can reduce the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. The lack of direct comparison between different antihypertensive drugs cannot evaluate the superiority-inferiority differentiation of different antihypertensive drugs in reversing LVH. Therefore, the objective of this protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of different types of antihypertensive drugs in reversing LVH in hypertensive patients. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed data obtained from the retrieved studies includes the following sections: (I) study characteristics; (Ⅱ) patient demographics; (III) clinical characteristics; (IV) data of recorded outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used for quality assessment of included RCTs, containing the following domains: random sequence generation; allocation concealment; blinding of participants and personnel; blinding of outcome assessors; incomplete outcome data; selective reporting; and other forms of bias [ 12 , 13 ]. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) system was applied to evaluate each included real-world study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed data obtained from the retrieved studies includes the following sections: (I) study characteristics; (Ⅱ) patient demographics; (III) clinical characteristics; (IV) data of recorded outcomes. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used for quality assessment of included RCTs, containing the following domains: random sequence generation; allocation concealment; blinding of participants and personnel; blinding of outcome assessors; incomplete outcome data; selective reporting; and other forms of bias [ 12 , 13 ]. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) system was applied to evaluate each included real-world study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%