2020
DOI: 10.1353/jda.2020.0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Efficacy of Life-Cycle and Absolute Income Hypothesis in Pakistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings confirm the presence of AIH and income ratchet effect in Pakistan. Ammad and Ahmed (2018) analyses the aggregate consumption function under the PIH for Pakistan based on the Cagan (1956) and Gujrati and Porter (2009) methodologies. Their study proves that there is no significant role of past consumption on the present consumption decision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings confirm the presence of AIH and income ratchet effect in Pakistan. Ammad and Ahmed (2018) analyses the aggregate consumption function under the PIH for Pakistan based on the Cagan (1956) and Gujrati and Porter (2009) methodologies. Their study proves that there is no significant role of past consumption on the present consumption decision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As aggregate demand is highly influenced by one factor so precise assessment of consumption is required for effective economy administration (Khan and Ahmad , 2014). Consumption theory explains the nexus between consumption and income (Ammad and Ahmed, 2018;Bibi, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the current income affect current spending just to the degree that they are permanent, necessitating a recalculation of lifetime consumable assets. The impact of transient income increases on spending is expected to be minor (Ammad & Ahmed, 2020). Each of the three theories is based on the microeconomics theory of consumer decision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%