2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12664-018-0921-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative efficacy of sofosbuvir-ribavirin versus sofosbuvir-daclatasvir for treatment of chronic hepatitis C in an area with limited NS5A inhibitor availability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anemia was shown to be the most common consequence linked with antiviral medication, according to our findings. In comparison to earlier studies undertaken to establish the efficacy of Antiviral Therapy in HCV infected patients, which found a prevalence of anaemia ranging from 18 to 30% [19][20], these findings are consistent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Anemia was shown to be the most common consequence linked with antiviral medication, according to our findings. In comparison to earlier studies undertaken to establish the efficacy of Antiviral Therapy in HCV infected patients, which found a prevalence of anaemia ranging from 18 to 30% [19][20], these findings are consistent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This study did not use VEL, but our results with use of all of the four aforementioned treatment protocols were in line with previous data. 12,13 In a study by Umar et al SVR was achieved in 83%. 14 In 2018, a study by Abozeid M et al showed SVR achieved in 98%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This study did not use VEL, but our results with use of all of the four aforementioned treatment protocols were in line with previous data. 12 , 13 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This regimen is obviously burdened with fewer side effects, but the optimal duration of treatment in GT2 is still object of debate. [16][17][18] An important further consideration is that the reported percentage of cirrhotic subjects in the aforementioned studies was quite modest (between 20% and 30%), 10,[13][14][15][16][17][18] like almost all the previous ones, starting from clinical trials. [19][20][21][22] So, in our opinion, the current literature is still not conclusive for the very specific subset of cirrhotic GT2 patients in defining the optimal RBV dose and the correct therapy duration, the latter one concerning specifically SOF plus RBV treatment, for which Italian (and European) clinicians could lawfully-in accordance with the guidelines available at that time-administer four different treatment schedules, namely 12, 16, 20, or 24 weeks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, taking into consideration that anemia can represent a relevant problem especially for the most frail categories of subjects and that there are patients who are not eligible for RBV mostly due to baseline anemia, an alternative strategy to reducing RBV on treatment is represented by RBV‐free DAA regimens, the first of which historically available was the association of SOF plus the NS5A inhibitor daclatasvir (DCV). This regimen is obviously burdened with fewer side effects, but the optimal duration of treatment in GT2 is still object of debate 16–18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%