2020 23rd International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS) 2020
DOI: 10.23919/icems50442.2020.9291123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Evaluation of 800V DC-Link Three-Phase Two/Three-Level SiC Inverter Concepts for Next-Generation Variable Speed Drives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2-L converter shows the worst overall performance, as already expected from previous analyses [3,5,6]. The 3-L SNPCC instead requires the lowest total semiconductor chip area and offers an efficiency comparable to the one of the 3-L NPC converter.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2-L converter shows the worst overall performance, as already expected from previous analyses [3,5,6]. The 3-L SNPCC instead requires the lowest total semiconductor chip area and offers an efficiency comparable to the one of the 3-L NPC converter.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…800 V, the voltage rating of the devices must increase accordingly, leading to higher switching losses and larger overall semiconductor chip area. Three-level (3-L) inverters, such as the Neutral-Point Clamped (NPC) and T-Type topologies, rep-resent excellent candidates for higher voltage drives, as they employ devices with reduced voltage ratings ensuring superior overall performance [3][4][5]. Moreover, taking advantage of the increased number of output voltage levels, they reduce the high-frequency harmonic current stress on the driven machine [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the power is only required to flow from the grid to the load, three-level unidirectional rectifiers represent perfect candidates for general active rectification [7][8][9]. In particular, these converter topologies trade higher efficiency and power density for a slight complexity increase, thus achieving improved performance with respect to conventional two-level inverters [3][4][5].…”
Section: DCmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) control of the DC-link mid-point voltage deviation under normal operating conditions (i.e., balanced split DC-link loading). Other desired features include, but are not limited to, (4) minimization of the DC-link mid-point third-harmonic voltage oscillation [8,10], which directly affects the size of the DC-link capacitors and may be hard to reject by the subsequent conversion stage [11]; (5) full control of the DC-link mid-point voltage deviation under unbalanced split DC-link loading [7], which may occur when separate DC/DC units are connected to the two DC-link halves (e.g., in DC fast chargers [12]); and (6) operation under non-unity power factor, to support the reactive energy flows in distribution grids [13]. All the aforementioned required and desired features can be addressed either with a proper converter control strategy (1)-( 6) [14][15][16], with an accurate AC-side filter design (1) [17,18], or with an appropriate selection of the converter modulation strategy (4) [8,19].…”
Section: DCmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation