1994
DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(94)90085-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of active vs passive system designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many safety standby systems to mitigate consequences of an accident in NPPs. The entire reliability of safety standby systems greatly depends on the successful operation of some standby component which is supposed to move mechanically (Buchner and Fabian, 1994). Standby equipment does not provide any information for the perception of equipment condition because it is not in operation.…”
Section: Component Unavailability Reduction Through Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many safety standby systems to mitigate consequences of an accident in NPPs. The entire reliability of safety standby systems greatly depends on the successful operation of some standby component which is supposed to move mechanically (Buchner and Fabian, 1994). Standby equipment does not provide any information for the perception of equipment condition because it is not in operation.…”
Section: Component Unavailability Reduction Through Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General passive systems and strategies however have a critical limitation, especially for passive injection systems. As these systems use gravity as their driving force (Buchner and Fabian, 1994), it is difficult to inject coolant in a passive way in high-pressure conditions, and thus depressurization is needed to inject coolant to the reactor coolant system (RCS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%