2019
DOI: 10.4103/theiaforum.theiaforum_2_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of air-Q and classic laryngeal mask airway for surgeries under anesthesia: A randomized open-label trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OSP was determined by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system up to 30 cm H 2 O, at a fixed gas flow of 3 litres per minute and recording the airway pressure on the monitor at which equilibrium was reached and by detection of audible noise or by listening air leak through a stethoscope placed on the neck. [ 8 - 10 ] To ensure safety, maximum allowable OSP was set at 40 cm H 2 O, and adjustable pressure limiting valve pressure was released if there was no audible leak even at maximum allowable pressure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The OSP was determined by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system up to 30 cm H 2 O, at a fixed gas flow of 3 litres per minute and recording the airway pressure on the monitor at which equilibrium was reached and by detection of audible noise or by listening air leak through a stethoscope placed on the neck. [ 8 - 10 ] To ensure safety, maximum allowable OSP was set at 40 cm H 2 O, and adjustable pressure limiting valve pressure was released if there was no audible leak even at maximum allowable pressure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%