2018
DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_225_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of antibiofilm efficacy of chitosan nanoparticle- and zinc oxide nanoparticle-incorporated calcium hydroxide-based sealer: An In vitro study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second mechanism is the production of free radicals such as reactive oxygen species which can affect the resistance of bacterial cells by inhibiting protein function and damaging deoxyribonucleic acid. 22 This present study revealed the development of the inhibition zone of ERB sealer also occurred with no addition of chitosan nanoparticles. It might be due to the presence of antibacterial components, such as hexamethylenetetramine and formaldehyde in the ERB sealer used in this study (AH 26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The second mechanism is the production of free radicals such as reactive oxygen species which can affect the resistance of bacterial cells by inhibiting protein function and damaging deoxyribonucleic acid. 22 This present study revealed the development of the inhibition zone of ERB sealer also occurred with no addition of chitosan nanoparticles. It might be due to the presence of antibacterial components, such as hexamethylenetetramine and formaldehyde in the ERB sealer used in this study (AH 26).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Likewise, Nair et al tested the antibiofilm potential of ZnO‐NPs and chitosan NPs against Enterococcus faecalis (OG1RF) and Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212). Chitosan NPs treatment significantly reduced the growth of E.faecalis (ATCC 29212) biofilm and Zno‐NPs found to exhibit antibiofilm properties against both of the strains 40 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chitosan NPs treatment significantly reduced the growth of E.faecalis (ATCC 29212) biofilm and Zno-NPs found to exhibit antibiofilm properties against both of the strains. 40 Recently, Khan et al 41 claimed that the sol-gel fabricated Zn nanospikes exhibits antibiofilm activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, ZN1 nanospikes reduced biofilm formation around (23-58%) at 200 μg/mL concentration and ZN2 nanospikes reduced maximum level of (85%) at 200 μg/mL concentration.…”
Section: Antibiofilm Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from bacteriostasis circle and SEM micrographs have identified that the synergistic bactericidal activity of chitosan NPs and CHX had the strongest inhibition against E. faecalis , irrespective of the types of sealers. However, one study by Nair et al [ 159 ] showed that the incorporation of chitosan NPs in Ca(OH) 2 sealer (i.e., Apexit Plus) failed to improve its antibacterial properties against E. faecalis strain OG1RF. Moreover, Ratih et al [ 160 ] found that the increment of chitosan NP concentration from 10% to 30% in epoxy resin-based sealer (AH-26) did not significantly enlarge E. faecalis inhibition zone, indicating the need for more comprehensive investigations to optimize the antimicrobial effects of chitosan NPs.…”
Section: Nanomaterials As Endodontic Sealersmentioning
confidence: 99%