2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of antioxidant capacities of thiol-based antioxidants measured by different in vitro methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, while FRAP assay requires an acidic pH (3.6), that is far from the physiological pH value, CUPRAC assay is performed at pH 7.0, simulating better the physiological conditions. In addition, CUPRAC assay differentiates the reducing power of thiol-type antioxidants (Apak et al, 2004;Güngör et al, 2011).…”
Section: Capacity Of Antioxidants To Reduce Metal Ions (Frap and Cuprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, while FRAP assay requires an acidic pH (3.6), that is far from the physiological pH value, CUPRAC assay is performed at pH 7.0, simulating better the physiological conditions. In addition, CUPRAC assay differentiates the reducing power of thiol-type antioxidants (Apak et al, 2004;Güngör et al, 2011).…”
Section: Capacity Of Antioxidants To Reduce Metal Ions (Frap and Cuprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of significant changes of total antioxidant capacity and glutathione activity in our study could be, at least partly, explained with methodological issues. Researchers reported that different assays used for detection of these antioxidative markers (including those used in our research) could have different diagnostic performances (Cighetti et al 2015, Güngör et al, 2011. Consequently, we could not exclude the possibility that the laboratory assays used in our study for these two analytes gave false-negative results, particularly if their changes were of small magnitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It then generates the cuprous form [Cu(I)-Nc] and displays a maximum light absorption of 450 nm (Güngör et al, 2011). Güngör et al (2011) compared the methods used to determine antioxidant activities of thiol based antioxidants and concluded that the most proper method for thiols was CUPRAC. They also concluded that the results obtained by the FRAP method were not consistent, even in the samples with a high GSH content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%