1990
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(90)90106-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative evaluation of cardioselectivity of metoprolol OROS and atenolol: A double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another single-dose study in 12 asthmatic patients showed similar results in postmedication baseline sGaw after 14/190 mg metoprolol oros, whereas after 100 mg atenolol postmedication baseline sGaw was significantly lower than after placebo. 12 In that study single doses of both metoprolol oros and atenolol blunted the salbutamol-induced A U Q c values, with no significant difference between the drugs. 12 These conflicting results on the bronchial effects of single doses of cardioselective ^-adrenergic receptor antagonists indicate a different sensitivity to 0-adrenergic receptor antagonism in different groups of mild to moderate asthmatic patients.…”
Section: Effects On Ft-adrenergic Receptors Of Bronchial Smooth Musclementioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another single-dose study in 12 asthmatic patients showed similar results in postmedication baseline sGaw after 14/190 mg metoprolol oros, whereas after 100 mg atenolol postmedication baseline sGaw was significantly lower than after placebo. 12 In that study single doses of both metoprolol oros and atenolol blunted the salbutamol-induced A U Q c values, with no significant difference between the drugs. 12 These conflicting results on the bronchial effects of single doses of cardioselective ^-adrenergic receptor antagonists indicate a different sensitivity to 0-adrenergic receptor antagonism in different groups of mild to moderate asthmatic patients.…”
Section: Effects On Ft-adrenergic Receptors Of Bronchial Smooth Musclementioning
confidence: 83%
“…12 In that study single doses of both metoprolol oros and atenolol blunted the salbutamol-induced A U Q c values, with no significant difference between the drugs. 12 These conflicting results on the bronchial effects of single doses of cardioselective ^-adrenergic receptor antagonists indicate a different sensitivity to 0-adrenergic receptor antagonism in different groups of mild to moderate asthmatic patients. 20 Therefore, in the treatment of hypertensive asthmatic patients, it would seem sensible to avoid /3-adrenergic receptor antagonists, as alternative forms of antihypertensive therapy are likely to be as effective and at least as well tolerated.…”
Section: Effects On Ft-adrenergic Receptors Of Bronchial Smooth Musclementioning
confidence: 83%
“…Analysis of change in FEV 1 associated with the use of cardioselective betablockers in double-blind studies has recently been performed and mean results, both statistically and clinically, have been minimal (28). Consequently, we examined these same double-blind studies for evidence of either symptoms or marked decline in FEV 1 in individual patients due to cardioselective beta-blocker -induced bronchospasm (Table 1) (26,(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50). Because the focus of this article concerns patients with heart failure or a history of MI, any patients in these reports with bronchospasm due to agents with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity were not included.…”
Section: Evidence For Cardioselective Beta-blocker -Induced Bronchospasmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its role in relation to ~-blockers has been discussed by Kendall and John (1985). More recently, its advantages in terms of ~l-selectivity based on a study in patients with reversible obstructive airways disease have been presented (Tantucci et al 1990). In a replicate design study the CR and 'Oros' formulations were compared, and both gave similarly even plasma concentration profiles (Abrahamsson et al 1990b).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Extended Release Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%